Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs.
Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree or disagree. Be certain to fully develop your position and carefully consider ways in which your position could be challenged.
From the Earth formerly thought as flat-shaped, the parochial belief of the impossibility for flight let alone going to the moon, disbelief in blackholes, theory of relativity and many more, the evolution of the world has been perpetually controversial. As such, controversial subjects are inevitable and their avoidance is a bane to the development of the world. The statement which affirmed that engaging in controversial topics is incongruous to the origin of the world's development. Indeed, controversial subjects in the sciences, humanities, businesses, religions and many more have been the basis of our current trajectories and great enlightenment -all of which are deciphered through active but not apathetic engagements.
The avoidance of controversial topics on individual's or groups' core beliefs is synonyms to conceding to their opinions and indirectly strengthening them to continue in their supposed malfeasances. A typical example is the common and profound goal of Christianity which is to preach the gospel to everyone and bring more souls to their Lord Jesus Christ. However, some Christians emphasize the need to avoid controversial subjects which is a paradox as their aim of changing one's core beliefs should not be expected easy without challenges. Additionally, some opposition views might not stop at their controversial view but might promulgate derogatory statements to one's core beliefs which must be repudiated through either one's direct or indirect engagements. A typical example is Albert Einstein whose theory of relativity was harshly criticized but his tenacious engagements in the same discourse have been a turning point for the world.
It is also crucial to state that your point of view might be the wrong one. There is a need to always hear the mavericks or oppositions out. Some iconoclastic sayings might sound exasperating and opaque but should not necessitate a snub. The flaws in one's core beliefs can't be identified by being taciturn or disregarding others view. Embracing it will not only challenge your core beliefs but promote more self reflections which might come in handy.
Nevertheless, controversial discourse are mostly contentious which generate heated and often times emotionally derogatory statements. Considering the evolution of mankind and the world trajectory, avoidance should not be an option but embracing them with a placid sense. Comparing the results -although exacting- that comes out at the long term from controversial discourse to their avoidance shows apathy is not a safe zone but a stagnant one.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 468, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...ics is incongruous to the origin of the worlds development. Indeed, controversial subj...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 475, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...h is a paradox as their aim of changing ones core beliefs should not be expected eas...
^^^^
Line 3, column 666, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ght promulgate derogatory statements to ones core beliefs which must be repudiated t...
^^^^
Line 5, column 252, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ld not necessitate a snub. The flaws in ones core beliefs cant be identified by bein...
^^^^
Line 5, column 270, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... a snub. The flaws in ones core beliefs cant be identified by being taciturn or disr...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, nevertheless, regarding, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2181.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 397.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49370277078 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18794976203 2.79657885939 114% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544080604534 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 673.2 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.0982764631 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.294117647 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3529411765 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.35294117647 5.21951772744 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20593944373 0.243740707755 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0680498525276 0.0831039109588 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517952018296 0.0758088955206 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120929614582 0.150359130593 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483690821149 0.0667264976115 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 14.1392134831 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.1639044944 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 100.480337079 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 11.8971910112 139% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.7820224719 144% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.