Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs.
Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree or disagree. Be certain to fully develop your position and carefully consider ways in which your position could be challenged.
The prompt sincerely supports the idea that discussing controversal topics with the people having contrasting views might not be of any use as they will hardly help themselves to change their viewsand beliefs. For certain reasons I "mostly disagree" with this statement for which I am going to elaborate my point of view for the same.
To begin with - as it is conspicuously said that it is of no use to discuss controversal matters with people of opposing views - I take firm opposition of it. The prompt is not discussing about the convinient of the views of the opposing party. When we talk with someone having different views from us it is not necessary that we will try to convinve him or her towards us. We might have a modest conversation regarding anything just enrich our knowledge. Who knows, by talking with someone having different point of view might deliver us some new horizons from which till we are not introduced. In that case - it would not be a wise one to predict that the conversation will be of no use.
Secondly, it will not be good idea to tantamount that each and every people will react in the same way when they will be asked about the controversal ideas or regarding their core beliefs. There will be some people who will handle the the total convo pretty coolly. Contrarily, there will be some people who will be up for a face-off. So, depending on the people the situation will differ.
Elaborating my previous point; for example - in Islamic culture it is believed that Eid-Ul-Adha is a day of joy, slaughtering a cow in order to offer probity to the God. To the muslims it is of their beliefs and core culture. On the otherhand, in Hinduism - cow is believed to be God for the Hinduists. So, it is clearly evident that followers of Islam and Hinduism are holding different beliefs from the other. But does that necessarily mean that they will question their rituals or beliefs? No. For evidence we can look up to different multcultural countries such as - Bangladesh, India etc for better understanding. If it happens in that way then people of different religions may not live together for years because of clash of opinions and other not so cool stuffs.
However, this same scenerio will run in to dilemma whenever one group of people will try to impose their own beliefs upon other. Then the problem arises. It is true that people hardly like the interrogation of their core beliefs. In general sense, people try to hold on to their beliefs what they have learned through their ancestors. As a result there is a good possibility of arousion of clash or will be of zero importance when these people are imposed to be deterrent from their beliefs.
Saying so, it will be all okay and will be a great source of knowledge for the knowledge seekers who want to learn new things regarding other beliefs and controversal matters until the people to whom they are clinging are not imposed or in other way are not being dictated by other beliefs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 62, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
... is conspicuously said that it is of no use to discuss controversal matters with pe...
^^^
Line 3, column 272, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...posing party. When we talk with someone having different views from us it is not neces...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 492, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...dge. Who knows, by talking with someone having different point of view might deliver u...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 232, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...ere will be some people who will handle the the total convo pretty coolly. Contrarily, ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 232, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...ere will be some people who will handle the the total convo pretty coolly. Contrarily, ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, for example, in general, such as, as a result, it is true, to begin with, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 19.5258426966 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.4196629213 185% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.3162921348 194% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 33.0505617978 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 78.0 58.6224719101 133% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2469.0 2235.4752809 110% => OK
No of words: 524.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71183206107 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7844588288 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67369142675 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.458015267176 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 756.9 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.5845774041 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.76 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.96 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28 5.21951772744 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260511554843 0.243740707755 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0857722521243 0.0831039109588 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0702297285646 0.0758088955206 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146529235206 0.150359130593 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.067669806731 0.0667264976115 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 48.8420337079 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.