There are always many disputes about the behavior of the business or political leaders that they do not enough take into account the right side of the compromise and always want to win. personally, I am of the notion that it is highly important for leaders to learn how to discuss in place of thinking how to win. There are some reasons mentioned below to vindicate my points of view.
First of all, paying too much attention to win a dispute may cause to be a little bias on the momentous issues and acts as an obstacle to make a reasonable decision. For example, consider Toshiba Company in Japan, that its leaders were not attentive to the reports of the employees and tried to refute their idea about the future of the company that the company will collapse, but the company leaders refused all the reports and try to only find inconsequential problems in their reports. But after some years, the giant Toshiba income slumped badly. the leaders made an strait for their company and brought the collapse of the company by neglecting the others view.
Second, trying to hear the opposite views and accept the bests parts play a pivotal role in advancement of the company. I believe that only fantastic leaders are brave enough to accept their mistakes and try to modify the problems. If leaders accept that the object of a compromise is to find an acceptable solution not to determine who is right, it will be a great step to the success. Back to the previous example, If one the leaders of Toshiba had agreed the antitheses, he/she would have enough time to save the company from collapse.
last but not least, not only political leaders but also all people need to learn how to compromise, because it will contribute them to have a better lives. For instance, there are many people who find out that they had been in a wrong track, but they do not accept their mistake because they think that they will lose something in their characters. I think accepting the previous mistakes not only does not reduce our characters but also help us to be a more moral person.
In conclusion, political and business leaders and ordinary people need to learn how to discuss.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 187, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Personally
... the compromise and always want to win. personally, I am of the notion that it is highly i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 552, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...the giant Toshiba income slumped badly. the leaders made an strait for their compan...
^^^
Line 3, column 569, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... income slumped badly. the leaders made an strait for their company and brought th...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Last
... to save the company from collapse. last but not least, not only political leade...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1793.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 383.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68146214099 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44963724197 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496083550914 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.2306677145 60.3974514979 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.533333333 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5333333333 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.21951772744 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0245328522606 0.243740707755 10% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00966948018264 0.0831039109588 12% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0124862048611 0.0758088955206 16% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.014882700334 0.150359130593 10% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0151137333374 0.0667264976115 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 100.480337079 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.