In this fast-paced world, the high educational institutions face increasing problems more than ever. Among those problems, there is one that most students and institutions would pay attention with: Should the educational institution shoulder the obligation to set the requirement by which institutions could refuse those students not good enough? To some extent, it does make sense since it could indirectly enable unqualified students to find the appropriate field. However, it should be constrained within a reasonable range.
The educational institutions, such as universities, definitely should take the responsibility to guide the students' direction to a certain degree, which is the social responsibility of educators. In fact, universities in the USA do make attempt to guild their students by the course structure. In the first two years in the University of the USA, for the required courses, most students are only allowed to select common foundational courses in different major. At the same time, students have a great number of selective courses in different fields and majors, helping them find the majors that they are really interested in. Major transfers are also common and convenient. By this course structure, students could find their desired major and universities fulfill their social responsibility as guide the students.
Nevertheless, the final decision should be left to students since no one could easily define the standard of success. The baseline for success is sometimes ambitious. The public tends to access the success from various aspects such as fame, power, wealth and other things which can hardly be achieved by ordinary individuals. On the other hand, from people who are satisfied with their current working and living conditions, they are successful since they are doing what they like. Additionally, the key factor to success is hard to estimate. For instance, the interest and passion in a particular field could be a contributing factor. According to a survey conducted in China by the HZNU, along with those top students in the different major, 50% of them claim that the interest is the key supporting factor. Additionally, the following panel study reveals that students motivated by interests have comparatively higher average salary and position compared to other students, indicating the interest is an important boosting factor in their career. In this sense, it should be left to the student to make the decision of the suitable field.
Still, the appropriate guidance from educational institutions is essential to students. There are several situations could lead the student to the wrong field and waste their time and tuition. The impression from the outsider to a particular major, for instance, could be misleading. In China, Millions of students enter the medicine major with the dream of being a lifesaver. However, a considerable number of those students transferred to other majors in 2 years due to heavy academic pressure and bad working environment. As what mentioned before, offering necessary guidance is the social responsibility of educational institutions. In order to fulfill this commitment, the educational institution should brief student on the situation of a major prior to their admission.
To sum up, the educational institution should be in charge of the commitment to preclude students from choosing the improper major by introducing all the potentially appropriate fields to students and left the decision to students themselves. In this way, students could choose the right major and have a better career.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...ld take the responsibility to guide the students direction to a certain degree, which is...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, really, so, still, for instance, in fact, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 83.0 58.6224719101 142% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3043.0 2235.4752809 136% => OK
No of words: 559.0 442.535393258 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44364937388 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.86242540663 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02800486523 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 268.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479427549195 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 936.9 704.065955056 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 13.0 4.99550561798 260% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 4.38483146067 365% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.2268050859 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.678571429 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9642857143 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.21951772744 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291416128125 0.243740707755 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784035170493 0.0831039109588 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586562088944 0.0758088955206 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184102745074 0.150359130593 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0243518581192 0.0667264976115 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 100.480337079 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.