The ultimate goal of education is to guarantee career success in the future for the students. Now, success can be different for each one. Educational institutions should be able to determine the goals of each and every student to consider whether they can provide the necessary to acknowledge that or not. As universities have multiple decades if not centuries of experience in working with students for a common goal, it’s in their best interest as well to correctly evaluate chances of each applicant and, if necessary, dissuade them from applying to a particular faculty or even to a university.
Universities and other educational institutions have on their hands data that students don’t. They know which jobs are trending, what professions are needed on the job market, what unique skills are required for various degrees. Students have a superficial understanding of those matters and definitely need some orientation from their tutors. By talking with students on orientation day university representatives should determine whether the chosen faculty suits them or not. Of course, one might state that representatives not always determine the potential of students correctly. Albert Einstein was one of the worst students in class, teachers ridiculed him for being behind almost everyone in class, however, he went on to become one of the most prominent scientist in the history. The percentage of tantamount situations is very small. Those who have the IQ and resiliency to achieve success will do it without a diploma.
In addition, universities are obliged to warn students about futility of studying and spending huge amount of money if the future of the students won’t be secured. Potential medical students can waste a lot of time, energy, and monetary resources on preparing for applying to a med school, but fail the entrance exams or be declined by the university board. Representatives of educational facilities are morally responsible to tell the students about any possible unfitness.
Moreover, they shouldn’t take tuition just for the sake of it. A valuable service, high-class education should be provided against it. The price of education is increasing year by year, it is becoming impossibly hard for average student to cover all the expenses related with college: preparation, tutoring, accommodation, books, tuition fees, etc. Thus, universities should approach the subject more responsibly, and notify potential candidates if the profession they have chosen is unsuitable for them. Although, here can be discussed what success means for anyone. For some it might monetary, for others creative success, for some being useful to the society in what they do. If the determination of success for the student is the same as promised by institution, even with some drawbacks, they can make up their mind with all the evidence at hand.
To conclude, the final decision is completely up to the candidate. However, they should have a detailed feedback from the institution they are applying to about future prospects.It is significant for planning a career path, if it’s worth investing vast amounts of money or not.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 179, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
... are applying to about future prospects.It is significant for planning a career pa...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, thus, well, in addition, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2669.0 2235.4752809 119% => OK
No of words: 499.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34869739479 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72634191566 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03556084771 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 264.0 215.323595506 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529058116232 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 849.6 704.065955056 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.8903039435 60.3974514979 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.208333333 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7916666667 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.21951772744 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157111264094 0.243740707755 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0460179467984 0.0831039109588 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0332734580362 0.0758088955206 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0920986114719 0.150359130593 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0172076684314 0.0667264976115 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 143.0 100.480337079 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.