Consider the following: a professor who always praises you, doesn’t criticize and evaluate your work at all or a professor who highlights the points in your work that can be improved, provides valuable feedback. Which one is more likely to assist you in succeeding in life? Is it the one who condones everything and is bordering on apathy towards your work, or the one who by pointing out the places that can be improved helps you become the better version of yourself?
There is always a spot for both praise and criticism. The argument that only by lauding students they can achieve their best is not complete. As in everything in life there should be a balance between constructive criticism and deserved approval. It is not achievable to instruct someone entirely with compliments or solely with negative remarks.
By merely praising someone tutors encourage that he or she can become lax and complacent, stop working on themselves. They find that there is no further space for improvement. An analogy to this can be found in sports. A team that is consistently winning is being lauded by sports commentators. If it is under incompetent management they would arrest self-improvement until other teams reach the same results as them. Continual accolades contribute to overrelaxation and losing the grip with the current situation.
Moreover, humanity as well as all extant species of flora and fauna on the planet learns on mistakes. The ubiquitous theory of evolution demonstrates that only those who continue to adapt to ever changing environment are the ones who survive in the end. Those who fail to achieve that become extinct. This is a process of trial and error; the winners learns on their and others’ mistakes to resume the existence. In the same way by essaying our first steps as toddlers humans fall countless times until finally we clinch the possibility of standing steadily on both feet. Our parents teach us what’s wrong and what’s right commencing from our first days in this world. It that weren’t the way we wouldn’t know how to hold fork and knife in our hands, how to cross the street, and instead eat with bare hands and run through the street on a red light.
To be fair, some people find it hard to accept criticism of their and might even get discouraged. It is facile to dishearten a child from taking up drawing or singing by one miniscule remark. However, there is always difference between constructive criticism and straight up negativism. Even to a little boy or girl ideas can be conveyed in a way they would understand and not get offended.
In summary, positive praise is commensurate to negative remarks, as long as both are accurate and don’t have an ulterior motive of fawning someone or disheartening them. Finding a balance between these two is the cornerstone of an excellent teaching.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 348, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iments or solely with negative remarks. By merely praising someone tutors encour...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, so, well, as to, in summary, as well as, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2392.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 480.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98333333333 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68069463864 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88861510455 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 268.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558333333333 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 739.8 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.7215653545 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4615384615 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.84615384615 5.21951772744 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125505018019 0.243740707755 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.029701919946 0.0831039109588 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039394643512 0.0758088955206 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0601511273217 0.150359130593 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412962579669 0.0667264976115 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 14.1392134831 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 100.480337079 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.