Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
The statements argue that the responsibility of the educational institute is to dissuade students from pursuing those fields in which they are not likely to be succeeded. Many of us argue that this will hold all the time, while others will counter this. In my essay, I will highlight why educational institutes should not dissuade students and will provide sound reasoning for the same.
First, educational institutions play a vital role not only in shaping the future of their student but also in the future of the world. So, they should more focus on providing quality education to their student and also provide equal opportunities to every one to groom themselves. So, I don't think so that dissuading students from pursuing fields of study just because the institute feels that he/she won't succeed make any sense. For example, Albert Einstein, who is the accomplished mathematicians and scientists known to humankind had failed in his 9th standard, but his institute did not dissuade him to pursue Physics.
Secondly, no one has the moral right to stop someone from doing what they want to pursue. The educational institutions can provide their guidance to the students so that they can determine what will or which field will be good for them to pursue. Every student has the right to at least pursue those fields in which he will likely be unsuccessful if they want to.
Third, success does not depend on the single factor, there are multiple factors on which success depends like hard work, dedication, persistence. And if a student has all these factors, then their chances to succeed will increase or they can improve their week points. So, judging someone in the early stage should not be done as success is a continuous effort taken by the individual to improve and being dedicated and patient when things don’t always go the desired way.
In nutshell, we can say that the student should not be dissuaded from pursuing any of the fields. They should give at least one chance to try as mentioned above, success does not depend on the single factor.
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could 50
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts 50
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s field of study 75
- The well being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority 66
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 288, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...to every one to groom themselves. So, I dont think so that dissuading students from ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 7, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... unsuccessful if they want to. Third, success does not depend on the single fa...
^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hings don’t always go the desired way. In nutshell, we can say that the studen...
^^^^^^
Line 10, column 13, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... go the desired way. In nutshell, we can say that the student should not b...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, then, third, while, at least, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1725.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 350.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92857142857 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59984457934 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528571428571 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3423289186 60.3974514979 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 115.0 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.384082955522 0.243740707755 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13828190401 0.0831039109588 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125609819961 0.0758088955206 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21446438209 0.150359130593 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0927972592137 0.0667264976115 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 100.480337079 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.