Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
There are many famous people who got succeeded in the field of their forte. The speaker, in the above prompt, argues that educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade their student in pursuing a field where they are unlikely to succeed. It is partly true that, in many cases, students are not beneficial from pursuing a field in which they are unlikely to be successful. Thus, I mostly agree with author of that argument. And, in the next three paragraphs, I will explain, with examples, why this statement is partly true and what is the exception.
first of all, sometimes students do not know in which field they are good at. If institution, in this perspective, dissuade the students from pursuing a field they are unlikely to succeed, then its cost-benefit is much higher. Because, when they do not have a forte to pursue, the institution should persuade the students in making their on-going filed as their forte. Say, for instance, An undergraduate student of Economics, in his fresh year, tells his professor that she does not want to pursue that field because she is making bad grades in her exam. But, when professor galvanize her by saying that everyone struggles at the begining of everything and after their trying times they do well by working hard. Because of professor's inspiration that undergraduate student got a CGPA of 4.00 out 4.00. Thus, there are, as the above example, some cases where professors need to persuade them rather than dissuading.
However, history says that a student will not get successful in future in a field where they were unlikely to succeed in their school or college. For example, Bill Gates dropped from Harvard business school because he was unlikely to succeed in his school. And in the next time he got succeeded in another field. Therefore, institutions have a responsibility to dissuade the students in pursuing a field where they are unlikely to succeed.
Moreover, there are some kind of fields where to get succeed one needs to have a predilection for that subject. For instance, one cannot pursue in astronomical science or quantum mechanics without having a penchant for these subjects. because these subjects have some esoteric terms and equation that can perplex one mind or can dissuade him or her if she or he does not like or love that subject. In this type of situation, institutions need to dissuade them in pursuing the field.
In sum, though, in few cases, one is likely to succeed in the field where they were unlikely to succeed in school, most of the cases they fail in competing in job market.
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and suppor 50
- People s attitudes are determined more by their immediate situation or surroundings than by society as a whole 75
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts Write a response in which you d 50
- According to a recent report by our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actual 48
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
...tly true and what is the exception. first of all, sometimes students do not know ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 339, Rule ID: ON-GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
...d persuade the students in making their on-going filed as their forte. Say, for instance...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 714, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ing times they do well by working hard. Because of professors inspiration that undergra...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 859, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., as the above example, some cases where professors need to persuade them rather ...
^^
Line 7, column 26, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'kinds'?
Suggestion: kinds
...o succeed. Moreover, there are some kind of fields where to get succeed one need...
^^^^
Line 7, column 236, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
...t having a penchant for these subjects. because these subjects have some esoteric terms...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, kind of, first of all, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.3162921348 194% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 33.0505617978 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2150.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 439.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89749430524 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.706830943 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 215.323595506 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.464692482916 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 660.6 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0232653448 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.380952381 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9047619048 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2380952381 5.21951772744 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312307819628 0.243740707755 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107818803873 0.0831039109588 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.098221841353 0.0758088955206 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186915237197 0.150359130593 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0809340892296 0.0667264976115 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.38706741573 86% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 100.480337079 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.