Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position
The best investement is to be in your comfort zone, if one doesn’t have the passion to bake a cake, how does he bake it and stand for several hours to finish it in a best form could it be. The prompt says that educational institutions shlould preclude their students from pursuing the fields where they won’t be successful. I strongly agree with the prompt suggestion for two reasons.
First, educational institutions comes in its priority after parents. While parents teach their kids how to be a good person and how to deal with the others, schools teach the students how to shape their career path and their future. Therefore, the pedagogical institutions should encourage the students to seek their comfort areas and study the most fields they will be able to add value to it. Otherwise, the students perhaps pursue the wrong path. For example, if someone wants to be a mathematicians, how does he be if not like math. Similarly, the docter, how does be a docter if not like biology. Thus, the above example tries to illusterate to what extent the schools or all the educational institutions have a crucial role to guid the students to the right way which approperiates their skills and dexterities.
Second, if these institutions don’t advice the students which way should interest in, the student will be distracted between many areas and will waste his time in some areas he dosen’t have the passion to study and exert effort in it. For example, if a student fond of biology and doesn’t like the mathematices, do you think which course will do his best in studying it? Of course, the course he likes. Therefore, if the schools and other educational institutions guided those students and provided them with the needed courses where their skills are strong, will save their time and help them to be ready for choose the best path which will succeed in the future.
In conclusion, all the educational properities have the role to guid the students to not waste their time in the areas where they are weak and it’s better for them to invest their time in studing what they are interested in. No one can withstands with any filed hardships but if he has the compassion on it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 165, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...stand for several hours to finish it in a best form could it be. The prompt says ...
^
Line 3, column 20, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'institutions'' or 'institution's'?
Suggestion: institutions'; institution's
... for two reasons. First, educational institutions comes in its priority after parents. Wh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 487, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a mathematician' or simply 'mathematicians'?
Suggestion: a mathematician; mathematicians
...th. For example, if someone wants to be a mathematicians, how does he be if not like math. Simil...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 237, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'withstand'
Suggestion: withstand
...what they are interested in. No one can withstands with any filed hardships but if he has ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, similarly, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1819.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 381.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77427821522 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64267057069 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477690288714 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.1928839984 60.3974514979 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.6875 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8125 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.21951772744 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209179786392 0.243740707755 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735311553431 0.0831039109588 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575839535571 0.0758088955206 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130205814164 0.150359130593 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386146415138 0.0667264976115 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 48.8420337079 133% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 100.480337079 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.