Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and suppo

Essay topics:

Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.

Proponent of educational institutions actively encouraging their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers do so considering the financial stability attached to such careers, but am strongly of an opposite opinion on institution imposing on students what careers to pursue.
Jobs considered to be high earning in the early nineteen century such as calligraphers at the boon of computers and internet have become unattractive and many jobs as such which robots have replaced humans in their dispatch of services and goods, on many occasions individuals will pursue a course and on graduating the field has become obsolete with no one requiring their services. Another example is was the peace treaty signed on stopping the development of nuclear weapon after the Hiroshima and Nagasaki explosion dealing a crushing blow on physicist and many staffs of military nuclear research centers. Passion should be the basis for considering an occupation that way one can also redefine it even when society tends not to require the service of some occupation
A senerior where institutions encourage student to go for lucrative job and they all eye same field should be considered, apart from thwarting the purpose school are trying to achieve, (no field in life can provided jobs for the entire population of graduates of just one university), it also affect the society at large destroying diversity in the community.
There this common saying that one's effectiveness is fuel by ones passion. If students are forced to do what they do not like in favour of a lucrative job has caused so many mental health issues for victims of such circumstance and people who survived end up going to do their dream job. I will give an example of a popular musician in my country by the name of Dr Sid, his passion was music, but he was pressured to study medicine after two years of working and enduring he went back to school to study music.

In conclusion institution are to guide with the decision making, and leave it to the student to make up their mind what career path they intend to follow.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 58, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'century' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'centuries'.
Suggestion: centuries
...o be high earning in the early nineteen century such as calligraphers at the boon of co...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 400, Rule ID: VBZ_VBD[1]
Message: Did you mean 'it'?
Suggestion: it
...quiring their services. Another example is was the peace treaty signed on stopping...
^^
Line 2, column 403, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...ring their services. Another example is was the peace treaty signed on stopping the...
^^^
Line 3, column 292, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'affects'?
Suggestion: affects
...aduates of just one university, it also affect the society at large destroying diversi...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, apart from, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1762.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 356.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94943820225 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74055976855 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589887640449 0.4932671777 120% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 20.2370786517 40% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 44.0 23.0359550562 191% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 130.567930117 60.3974514979 216% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 220.25 118.986275619 185% => OK
Words per sentence: 44.5 23.4991977007 189% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.21951772744 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240706145431 0.243740707755 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0955004200226 0.0831039109588 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0959357989828 0.0758088955206 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144559712462 0.150359130593 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.093349681047 0.0667264976115 140% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 24.1 14.1392134831 170% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.82 48.8420337079 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.5 12.1743820225 168% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.32 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.17 8.38706741573 121% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 31.0 11.8971910112 261% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 19.6 11.2143820225 175% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.