The effectiveness of a country’s leaders is best measured by examining the
well-being of that country’s citizens.
In the history of the world there are numerous examples of countries’ leaders with different characteristics. The fact is that the destiny of the countries and their people depends on their leaders. Thus, if leader has improved the well-being of his country’s people he is considered a Father of the nation and its hero, but if the leader has followed just his own ambitions which not always are really valuable and positive, the destiny of the country and its people becomes a tragedy. In my opinion, I strongly agree that the welfare of the people of one country should by measured by the effectiveness of its leader.
To begin, there are many leaders in the history who have fighted for better life of their people. these leaders often used cooperation instead of competitiveness which approved their effectiveness and resulted with a victory. For instance, Gandhi who was a leader of Indians, firstly in south africa and later in India, by his approach of non-violent civil disobedience has won against the British rule. His leadership model was followed in whole world. For example, Nelson mandela, the first black democratically elected in south africa using non-violent civil disobedience model
ended the apartheid in 1994. Helped by the previous president de klerk, mandela won against discrimination of the nations and race others then white in south africa for which both mandela and de klerk won nobel prize for The peace in the world. The third example of non-violent disobedience is martin luther king. he fighted against discrimination of the African americans in the us. martin luther king was the youngest leader in the world to be awarded with nobel prize for the Piece in the world too.
The effectiveness of these leaders is obvious. They dedicated their lives for the freedom of their people which is the first human right without human progress is impossible.
Further, in the conditions of peace, the well-being of the people still depends on many conditions. these are physical well-being, public safety and social and economical equality, education, science, arts, cultural heritage. The countries considered for the best well-being of their people nowadays are certainly countries where the effectiveness of the leaders is measured by instilling all these conditions of people’s welfare. For instance, nordic countries are considered the best for the well-being of their people. Their success is in establishing in socalled “nordic model” which implies social and economic policies followed by all nordic countries, Finland, Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Iceland and Greenland. This model assures that these countries are safe and stable. Since there is no corruption, their citizens have trust in the countries’ politics and police which pivotal for the quality of life. other great example of country with good well-being of people is Canada. Their Prime Minister Stephen Harper employed economical policies and propagated healthy business in the time of recession which saved Canadians from feeling impacts of the recession. other similar examples was much before employed by president Roosevelt in the time of great Depression when he introduced The New Deal programs and projects which developed american economy.
In conclusion, the greatness and well-being of one nation can be seen in the quality of its leader. if leader is negative, as it was Hitler then his ambitions results in tragedy of Germany and whole world. In contrast, examples as Lincoln and his Emancipation Proclamation can only improve the citizens’ welfare significantly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 567, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ee that the welfare of the people of one country should by measured by the effect...
^^
Line 6, column 99, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...ighted for better life of their people. these leaders often used cooperation instead ...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 162, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d cooperation instead of competitiveness which approved their effectiveness and r...
^^
Line 8, column 2, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Ended
...on-violent civil disobedience model ended the apartheid in 1994. Helped by the pr...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 316, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...ent disobedience is martin luther king. he fighted against discrimination of the A...
^^
Line 15, column 101, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...eople still depends on many conditions. these are physical well-being, public safety ...
^^^^^
Line 15, column 931, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Other
... which pivotal for the quality of life. other great example of country with good well...
^^^^^
Line 15, column 1049, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
... Prime Minister Stephen Harper employed economical policies and propagated healthy busines...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 1187, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Other
... from feeling impacts of the recession. other similar examples was much before employ...
^^^^^
Line 20, column 101, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...n be seen in the quality of its leader. if leader is negative, as it was Hitler th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, really, so, still, then, third, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 19.5258426966 164% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 78.0 58.6224719101 133% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3075.0 2235.4752809 138% => OK
No of words: 567.0 442.535393258 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42328042328 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.87972968509 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9636977337 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 266.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469135802469 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 937.8 704.065955056 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.0756747929 60.3974514979 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.821428571 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.89285714286 5.21951772744 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291599394803 0.243740707755 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0882327125269 0.0831039109588 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0953779739241 0.0758088955206 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14735683382 0.150359130593 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120526335175 0.0667264976115 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 150.0 100.480337079 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.