It's true that a country's leader's effectiveness can be measured by well being of it's citizens in some cases. However, there are certain cases were this is not the right way to judge a leader.
In an underdeveloped country, even the most effective leader might not be able to lift the lives of the citizens to ultimate well being that can be seen in other already developed countries. Consider an under developed nation hit by a malady. The most effective leader of this country might try to uplift the lives of it's citizens by improving healthcare of nation. He might succeed in saving many lives but some could still die because of inherent health care limitations country had before this leader assumed power. Also, he might attempt to lift the country's economy by trying to industrialize it, fighting against internal corruption and many other social reforms. This might help him to uplift county to some extent. But even then, the nation might not reach ultimate well being because of the preexisted issues from ling time. Even though this leader has improved the quality of life, the country is yet to reach the apotheosis of it's development. In these scenarios effectiveness of the leader should be measured by relative improvement that happened in the nation and not merely on country's citizens ultimate well being.
Even in a developed country, if a leader focuses only on current well being of it's citizens, it's not good enough. For example, if a country's leader is effective in all the internal affairs but have not maintained good international relations. Maybe an oil producing countries leader refuse to provide oil to other nations and thus made this nation a 'villain' in the eyes of rest of the world. This may not have immediate consequences, but in future this might affect the well being of the citizens. Thus, a leader, apart from current well being of citizens, should also focus on nation's future too.
With all the limitations of measuring effectiveness of a leader by countries citizens well-being, one must admit that it's one of the main parameter to judge a leader. Citizens will lead a prosperous life in someones tenure as country's leader only if the leader is effective. A good leader identifies the problems in the society, listen to people's demands and effectively works to resolve the issues which leads to ultimate well being of the citizens.
In conclusion, a leader's effectiveness can not just be measured by well-being of country's citizens. One must consider the future implications and past status of the nation to better judge a leader.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 824, Rule ID: LING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'long'?
Suggestion: long
...g because of the preexisted issues from ling time. Even though this leader has impro...
^^^^
Line 3, column 965, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'scenarios'' or 'scenario's'?
Suggestion: scenarios'; scenario's
...apotheosis of its development. In these scenarios effectiveness of the leader should be m...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 340, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'people'.
Suggestion: people
... the problems in the society, listen to peoples demands and effectively works to resolv...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 18, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
...ng of the citizens. In conclusion, a leaders effectiveness can not just be measured ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, still, then, thus, well, apart from, for example, in conclusion, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2150.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 434.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95391705069 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71919860826 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.444700460829 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 677.7 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.936422671 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.380952381 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 5.21951772744 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318731278068 0.243740707755 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119148164919 0.0831039109588 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0848453270297 0.0758088955206 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2262578513 0.150359130593 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0339118501383 0.0667264976115 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.