Emotional decision
Here the statement states that any decision made emotionally tends to a poor decision, which I totally agree with.
Firstly, any individual makes a judgment emotionally only under someone's influence which has nothing to do with the decision making on that particular topic. Nor the decision is based on pros and cons while considering emotionally. Let's take an example of an interview, suppose an interviewer is having a hectic and rough day before an interview of a particular peer, so under the influence of previous events, the decision making of current event will be affected by not addmitting that particular candidate. Whiich is totally unfair, if in given case he or she is a strong and smart candidate.
Continuing, due to influence of series of bad events before the interview for an interviewer, it can cost him/her a meticulous peer. Furthermore, for justifying his/her action, interviewer will come up with flaws of a candidate and will try to ignore good qualities of a peer. it is a mundane behviour of a person to prove his or her decision and justify it. Once a decision made emotinally cannot be amilerated in upcoming futre.
Sometimes, making decision under emotinal influence can also benifit an individual. supposing, someone is searching for her ideal other half, than considering emotions over logic can be justified. As this will involve more intimate and emotional feelings rather than searching for logic. Therefore, one cannot deny the fact that, making decisions emotinally are always wrong.
To sum up, we can conclude that it is not wise to make any decision emotionally, not only because the deciosion will be one sided, but also people have to come up with a plausible explanation to justify his/her side by hook or crook.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 233, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...and cons while considering emotionally. Lets take an example of an interview, suppos...
^^^^
Line 6, column 278, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...try to ignore good qualities of a peer. it is a mundane behviour of a person to pr...
^^
Line 6, column 360, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Once” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ove his or her decision and justify it. Once a decision made emotinally cannot be am...
^^^^
Line 8, column 85, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Supposing
...fluence can also benifit an individual. supposing, someone is searching for her ideal oth...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 377, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... decisions emotinally are always wrong. To sum up, we can conclude that it is no...
^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 235, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... justify his/her side by hook or crook.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, therefore, while, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1479.0 2235.4752809 66% => OK
No of words: 291.0 442.535393258 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0824742268 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87654114597 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594501718213 0.4932671777 121% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 704.065955056 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.7815752109 60.3974514979 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.642857143 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35714285714 5.21951772744 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287342003546 0.243740707755 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110948207518 0.0831039109588 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0792946581152 0.0758088955206 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179073091181 0.150359130593 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0819419931279 0.0667264976115 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 100.480337079 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.