Essay Topic 8: Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Dwindling and preserving natural reserves has been a controversial issue in recent years. Many argue that destruction of the few remaining pockets of wild life should be prevented as this endangers natural habitats of species even if it leads to economic benefits. On the contrary, others claim that the welfare of people is as important as the conservation of wildlife. Therefore, governments attempts must be made to find ways to protect nature and people’s needs.
It is evident that wilderness is habitats of multitude of species. Economic development would cause irreversible damage. It will place some aspects on the verge of extinction. To exemplify this, deforestation of northern areas of Iran has threatened habitat of Persian tiger in recent years. Some other species like squirrel and birds were died of environmental changes since they had to move to other areas. In addition, using and contaminating natural resources such as water due to economical developments has caused drought. We must bear in mind that once some species become extinct and their habitats are destroyed, they cannot be revitalized. According to the saying” Rome was not built in a day”, it will probably take hundreds of years to fix the ruined forests and natural landscapes. Furthermore, nature is just not for the species but it also belongs to the next generations. They have the right to see the nature and various species and use the natural resources as part of their life requirements. Thus, wildlife must be preserved.
In contrary, some would tend to argue that the economic development of various natural areas could help preserve the wildlife and other resources. Many endangered species and forests could be protected with the help of scientific developments. As some wilderness areas could turn to tourist resorts under the supervision of government and environmentalists, the income from such resorts could be used for protecting other natural areas. For instance, there are no sufficient water and food resources for the animals in south part of Iran. Thus, these species could be kept in protected areas and provided with supplies gained by income from other resorts like national parks.
We should also consider the fact that population is increasing. To meet their demands like houses, roads, highways, and food, nature must be used; however, the outcomes of development will be global warming, ozone layer depletion and lack of natural resources. Therefore, the government must pass laws and take actions to ban hunting and polluting the environment by people.
In conclusion, there should be a deep consideration to preserve wilderness areas to protect natural habitats. Considering economical developments as viable for the growing population, some laws must be passed to reduce the damage to the nature.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 486, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
... natural resources such as water due to economical developments has caused drought. We mus...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 123, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...o protect natural habitats. Considering economical developments as viable for the growing ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, thus, as to, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2400.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 448.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35714285714 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97110875683 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511160714286 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 741.6 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.3241664514 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.92 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.24 5.21951772744 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262198606902 0.243740707755 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0727184427471 0.0831039109588 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055751604355 0.0758088955206 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165636682483 0.150359130593 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059771119951 0.0667264976115 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 100.480337079 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.