Essay topics: A person who knowingly commits a crime has broken the social contract and should not retain any civil rights or the right to benefit from his or her own labor.
This topic raises the issue of whether a person who commits a crime knowingly, shall be allowed to retain any civil rights or not. Indisputably, the person is responsible for his or her own actions. Nevertheless, not every criminal deserves such severe punishments. Hence, I disagree with the opinion that a person who knowingly commits a crime should not retain any civil rights or the right to benefit from his or her labor and would like to argue that several factors need to be acknowledged before making such decision.
First of all, the reason and intention behind the crime must be considered. I would like to point out that there are times when the criminal has no choice but to commit the crime. For example, a beggar sees his children starve to death by each passing day. In such a circumstance, the beggar may rob a wealthy man out of some cents, to feed them. Consequently, it is pretty obvious that the reason behind the crime was justified, and it is not in our conscience to retain the civil rights of such a beggar whose only intention was to feed his children.
Furthermore, the extent of crime also needs to be taken into account. Specifically, whether the crime was a small act of robbery of a few cents or a colossal act of initiating decimation. To illustrate this further, I would like to cite an instance of a story I heard when I was a child. There lived a poor man in a city, who had been serving as a prisoner for twenty years. His only crime was that of stealing two apples from a vendor. Our common sense tells us that this is not morally right. Thus, all evidence demonstrates that not every criminal deserves such severe punishments for actions they have knowingly committed.
Admittedly, a malefactor is responsible for his crimes and should be punished for his deeds. This is true especially when his intention is diabolic and can cause greater crimes to occur. However, the above argument does not constitute sufficient support to the claim that criminals should not retain any civil rights or the right to benefit from his or her labor. Because although many criminals need such severe upbraids for breaking the social contract, not all of them are worthy of the same.
In conclusion, the above arguments provide a concrete base to justify my opinion that a person who knowingly commits a crime shall not always deserve non-retainment of civil rights and the rights to benefit from their labor. No decision can be undertaken without analyzing the case of the crime.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 361, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... some cents, to feed them. Consequently, it is pretty obvious that the reason beh...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, thus, as to, for example, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2075.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 437.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74828375286 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66671597613 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487414187643 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 648.9 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.7006315403 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.3181818182 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8636363636 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.40909090909 5.21951772744 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 17.0 5.13820224719 331% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.438409254767 0.243740707755 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116616726461 0.0831039109588 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135093195365 0.0758088955206 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.274176832752 0.150359130593 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142092574144 0.0667264976115 213% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 14.1392134831 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.