Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws.
I, to some extent, would like to agree with the statement given above - "Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and resist unjust laws". I will support my claim by enumerating my opinions in the upcoming paragraph.
Laws make up the integral part of any country's constitution or broadly the functioning and people of the country are obliged to abide by those laws made. When every person starts to disobey the government and not maintain decorum, it would lead to cataclysm of the nation. Theft, embezzlement, rape, murder and other egregious criminal activities would increase drastically. It can be easily argued that it all depends on the individual, and if he is good at heart, there won't be any such immoral acts committed. But let me tell you, a human being's brain is very complex and intricate, and it very well is capable of not doing the right stuff at times. Imagine this scenario where a man has had a really bad day and is heading to his place for dinner; he is stopped by a drunk man on the road and is being riled by him by absolutely no reason. Now, it might not take much time for our man who has had a rough day to, hit him maybe? Okay that is offensive but here, both might end up recriminating each other while each one can have a solid defense for their stance. Coming back to the point of where it is fine to disobey unjust rules, I'll throw some light on it now.
What is right and what is wrong is a grey area even now. What might be right to one person might sound ridiculous and unjust to the other. I'm sure laws have been put in place after much deliberation by the cabinet and it's not likely that they might be unjust to a great extent which would evoke a large population to protest. I would like to clear my stance again here by saying I am not against protesting. In fact, I am going to cite an example where protesting in large numbers worked wonders for the people of Tamil Nadu. 'Jallikattu', a traditional festival in the south of India was going to be banned by PETA who cited animal abuse. The south Indians retaliated to this claim saying they know much better about taking good care of animals and they didn't want to let go of their traditional festival. The people had eventually won in the end, after successful protests - but it came at a great cost, hence a pyrrhic victory. It is important to note here that protesting for every thing won't do any good and that will only turn the nation into a graveyard.
One can't keep disobeying laws according to own will if he feels that is unjust to him. It is good to bring a change in democracy, and there are ways to file a complain and revoke orders or laws. But blindly not abiding to the laws and doing what you feel is right is essentially wrong because from a third person's view, the very same law which you are disobeying might look very just to him and that will cause the population to be flummoxed by one's attitude.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1137, Rule ID: ILL_I_LL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'I'll'?
Suggestion: I'll
...ere it is fine to disobey unjust rules, Ill throw some light on it now. What is...
^^^
Line 3, column 1141, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Ill) must be used with a third-person verb: 'throws'.
Suggestion: throws
...it is fine to disobey unjust rules, Ill throw some light on it now. What is right...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 140, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...und ridiculous and unjust to the other. Im sure laws have been put in place after ...
^^
Line 5, column 417, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng I am not against protesting. In fact, I am going to cite an example where prot...
^^
Line 5, column 755, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ut taking good care of animals and they didnt want to let go of their traditional fes...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 5, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...urn the nation into a graveyard. One cant keep disobeying laws according to own w...
^^^^
Line 7, column 158, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...n democracy, and there are ways to file a complain and revoke orders or laws. But blindly ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, look, may, really, so, third, well, while, in fact, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2407.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 546.0 442.535393258 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.40842490842 5.05705443957 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83390555256 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45090520105 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 292.0 215.323595506 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534798534799 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 766.8 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8475735454 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.652173913 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7391304348 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.69565217391 5.21951772744 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243240891186 0.243740707755 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592638979732 0.0831039109588 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11485894755 0.0758088955206 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190453499047 0.150359130593 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140916463478 0.0667264976115 211% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 48.8420337079 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.59 12.1639044944 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.