As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
I, to a greater extent, disagree with the given statement because of the fact that it has been stated the ability of humans will 'surely' deteriorate as people rely more and more on technology. I would like to enumerate my opinions and viewpoints regarding the same in the following paragraph.
Technology has undoubtedly evolved massively over the past few years and it is only going to experience an exponential growth in the near future. This steady rise in technology has shaped our world in a completely different way, one that none would have thought of (and by different, I mean in a positive way). One can ascribe this development to the intelligence of humans. In the first place, it is us humans who are contributing to this ever growing field and there has been active participation in the same only because of the tremendous response from what is called 'consumers'. If there was no one to acknowledge or appreciate these new inventions, it is highly likely that we would not be witnessing what we are right now. It is a no-brainer to maintain that technology has made human life easier and I would strongly agree with it too. But, this in no way is a guarantee humans have stopped thinking or will stop thinking for themselves in the near future. For instance, let us take the example of how machines works in a pharmaceutical manufacturing unit. A few years earlier, all these machines were operated by humans and there were at least three to four people closely and cautiously working with one machine to ensure purity of the products manufactured. This working of humans at these plants came at a great cost, not only with respect time, but also with the risk of fatal injuries. Coming back to our present day scenario, most of the work is now computerized with minimal human intervention. This has helped us overcome the previously discussed limitations. Now, with the advent of such a technology, in a pharmaceutical plant, is it true that humans' ability to think will deteriorate? The answer to this question is very simple - NO! . Even now, it is those chemists who decide what goes where, when and how. They set up the base formula for every batch and computers just assist them in the process, along with numerous advantages like reducing the time consumption, decreasing the risks of injuries, and many more.
The given statement might sometimes hold true to some extent. Humans might tend to get tad bit lazy towards their work and thus might lead to procrastination as well. But at the end of the day, the same old notion - "Too much of anything is good for nothing"- holds true here as well. It all depends on that individual how he likes to handle everything and go about his life. There are positives and negatives surrounding us, in every aspect of life; how one wants to deal with those is what makes him/her stand apart from the rest. I would like to conclude by saying that this humongous growth in technology has benefitted us greatly than it has decreased our thinking capabilities and it will remain the same, or even get better, in the years to come
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 59, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
...tent, disagree with the given statement because of the fact that it has been stated the ability of human...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 291, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ave thought of and by different, I mean in a positive way. One can ascribe this development to th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1660, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...a pharmaceutical plant, is it true that humans ability to think will deteriorate? The ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1751, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...r to this question is very simple - NO! . Even now, it is those chemists who deci...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, regarding, so, thus, well, apart from, at least, for instance, i mean, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 33.0505617978 163% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 79.0 58.6224719101 135% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2561.0 2235.4752809 115% => OK
No of words: 538.0 442.535393258 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76022304833 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81610080973 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7669343568 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 295.0 215.323595506 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548327137546 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 819.0 704.065955056 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5560849498 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.708333333 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4166666667 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224698438573 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0553859957258 0.0831039109588 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0907272504493 0.0758088955206 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182900267089 0.150359130593 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105428835058 0.0667264976115 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 100.480337079 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.