Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and disobey unjust laws?
There goes a phrase that goes as thus “law abiding citizens which in all ramifications agrees to the first quota of the prompt and to disagrees to the second quota of the prompt. Thus, I mostly disagree with the prompt owing to the fact that individuals are to abide to laws propagated by lawmakers of the society by 2 reasons.
To begin with, laws are put in place to check balance working progress of its country be it its people, economic, health infrastructure, education etc. consequently; these laws do not meet the criteria of every individual but isn’t it said that human wants are insatiable? what others perceive as right, others view as unjust. Take for instance some parts of the United Stated of America proposed laws have been enacted concerning abortions; to a varying degree this law might sound preposterous to some elitist but then again laws are laws and must be adhered to. in an instance where one has an unwanted pregnancy and due to personal reasons would want to terminate the pregnancy, this law surely favors’ such counterpart. In that regard the elitist who do not find this law ethical would have to set their principles asides and adhere to these laws. trying to override an already placed law would cause a protest for the right to abort or not, and as we know human rights are ought to be considered.
Upon great introspection, law makers do not only actively propose laws that would be beneficial for the present but laws that will stand the test of times. It is a known fact that human lives matter irrespective of the color, race and religion; and as such LGBTQ’s laws does maintain the right to be heard and considered upon the bills law maker’s pass. in past times, a lot of persons have fought who they really are on the inside and as such live a life full of charade to other people, this single act has seen a spike in suicide cases, depression and so many more, because as of that time they had no law protecting them from the backlash of the society. In recent times, these laws have been enacted and has really helped a lot of people live their truth. but as with most laws, this law is certainly not palatable to others. there might as well be disagreements and protest about reverting such laws, but to what extent does a vandalizing riot and protest help the society? a peaceful society is what we all strive towards and if majority of the society shows a great predilection of such laws, the minority should concede.
Of a truth, from a very tender age values are instilled into children and the values and principle becomes the core of the person as he/ she advances. belligerently, laws that individuals grew up knowing and abiding by would be such a hard oil to swallow when another law varies from what they formally knew. Non-withstanding, it is worthy of note that there are lawmakers who thoroughly review laws that are already existing and research laws that would be to the betterment of the present society. Laws are not static and as such individuals should unbiased to laws that govern a society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 38, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: '”' seems to be missing
There goes a phrase that goes as thus “law abiding citizens which in all ramifi...
^
Line 2, column 55, Rule ID: WORKING_PROGRESS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'work in progress'?
Suggestion: work in progress
... laws are put in place to check balance working progress of its country be it its people, econom...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 273, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: What
...t said that human wants are insatiable? what others perceive as right, others view a...
^^^^
Line 2, column 853, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Trying
...ciples asides and adhere to these laws. trying to override an already placed law would...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 330, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'bills'' or 'bill's'?
Suggestion: bills'; bill's
...ght to be heard and considered upon the bills law maker’s pass. in past times, a lot ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 354, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...idered upon the bills law maker’s pass. in past times, a lot of persons have fough...
^^
Line 3, column 761, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...elped a lot of people live their truth. but as with most laws, this law is certainl...
^^^
Line 3, column 831, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...w is certainly not palatable to others. there might as well be disagreements and prot...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 980, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: A
...zing riot and protest help the society? a peaceful society is what we all strive ...
^
Line 4, column 151, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Belligerently
...core of the person as he/ she advances. belligerently, laws that individuals grew up knowing ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, really, second, so, still, then, thus, well, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2526.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 542.0 442.535393258 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66051660517 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82502781895 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5834396084 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 277.0 215.323595506 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511070110701 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 785.7 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6753143567 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.3 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1 23.4991977007 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1 5.21951772744 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332832047318 0.243740707755 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11546962788 0.0831039109588 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717268287192 0.0758088955206 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211371501728 0.150359130593 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399840446251 0.0667264976115 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 48.8420337079 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.