It is far more important to define who you are than what you stand against
Values and principles lies at the core of any individual, these set values and principles ultimately represents what an individual stands for and intimates what the individual is against. Set rules and principles that have been enacted and observed speak up for an individual when present or absent in a gathering. I mostly agree with the prompt based off the fact that when one has defined who he/she is and what they stand for, it is a brainer to be able to decipher what they do not stand for, juxtaposing the values one holds dearly invariably brings about what they stand against.
Defining who you are as an individual is crucial for everybody, defining who you are doesn’t have to be a harangue speech that s given at a go in one day. It has to go alongside actions and examples that make people really believe that you are indeed the person you solemnly speak of. In an office space where you are a reticent person, but every other staff goes against what you stand for. They share secrets vehemently and speak have such acrimony towards the bosses. You should not be found in the latter gathering as it goes against what you speak of. Associating yourself with such vociferous staffs places doubt in their minds and they get to think you are a two-timer. Restraining from those discussions makes a staunch statement and they know too well not to bring such discussions to you.
Having people question who you are and what you stand for can be such a travesty, people thinking that you might not be who you think you are makes the entire process of trying to explain what you stand against strenuous. It is very important to not sway the perception others have of you based on what you have said about your kind of person, this places doubt and questions about who you are. For instance, you preach about the fact that you are a very ingregous person and you claim to have the utmost respect for the elderly ones but then you are found going against everything you speak of, you are instead haughty and impertinent to the elderly. That goes a long way in making people wonder the kind of person you truly are.
Amongst friends and families who have watched you be a of a certain moral and value they might be in a constant state of ascetic because they saw you be a certain way and it might be hard to believe you have changed your person and now hold new values. But they do say change is constant and when your values are in order you need not have to remind people of what you stand against, your values do the talking. Having to constantly say what you are against is such a hassle as it is incongruous in people believing what you said about who you are. What you stand against is subtly imbedded in who you are.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 54, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ds and families who have watched you be a of a certain moral and value they might...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, really, so, then, well, as to, for instance, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 35.0 19.5258426966 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.3162921348 186% => OK
Pronoun: 71.0 33.0505617978 215% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2232.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 499.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.47294589178 5.05705443957 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72634191566 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32525042328 2.79657885939 83% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.424849699399 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 683.1 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.9039292969 60.3974514979 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7222222222 23.4991977007 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.38888888889 5.21951772744 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.489179539764 0.243740707755 201% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.21500352215 0.0831039109588 259% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141736710444 0.0758088955206 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.346464130907 0.150359130593 230% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103235273867 0.0667264976115 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 48.8420337079 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 12.1639044944 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.8971910112 164% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.