Formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and s

Essay topics:

Formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

“Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world”, these quotes wrote by Nelson Mandela. Our education system is good until thirteen years after that graduated from the university and still do not do creative things and thus one does not confident about his work. In spite of this, one much focus on practical work, not on the theoretical stuff that is what had learned from an institute. Formal education does not lead a student towards great success.

Firstly, we take an example of chemistry lab where students have not much time to do the experiments. They read many theoretical books to get the excellent marks or position from a class. But according to this theoretical stuff, they perform very less experiment. In addition, students have very less time to do the experiments. So they do not have another option, only focus on cramming the things. Formal education is valuable, only if students much focus on the functional part rather than theory. If university authority should give the more time to spend on the practical, then the students execute the experiments which were(was) done by many great scientists. Likewise, a student can implement the experiment with his different perspective. In this way, he can free to do creative things beyond the books rather than learn the book material. Obviously, a student shows their talent and he becomes a scientist in the future.

Secondly, as evidence, if we look at the great scientist like Albert Einstein, Nicole Tesla, Issac Newton, these all are performed the experiment with free thinkings. They do not target on the formal education. Even though they became famous throughout the world, everyone knows their practicals and still use it. From this, we also give the chance of free thinking to the students. Moreover, they will show their talents and become creative from their institutions. So that they do not face many(much) problems in their job life and also many of them famous as an entrepreneur.

In contrast, we can not totally ignore the formal education. Consequently, it brings discipline and makes daily routine in a task. Similarly, students should require formal education as well as free thinking. Hence, they become more accomplished and achieve future endeavors in life.

Recapitulating, we can say that students give freedom to think and do creative things so that they solve any problem and grow rapidly, may become a great scientist in forthcoming years. Thus, formal education will help carry discipline and routine.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 492, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t lead a student towards great success. Firstly, we take an example of chemistry...
^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 250, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...will help carry discipline and routine.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, hence, if, likewise, look, may, moreover, second, secondly, similarly, so, still, then, thus, well, in addition, in contrast, as well as, in spite of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 19.5258426966 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2134.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 416.0 442.535393258 94% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12980769231 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75751645588 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 649.8 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.70203956 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.0769230769 118.986275619 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 23.4991977007 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.30769230769 5.21951772744 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108401515267 0.243740707755 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0309571848722 0.0831039109588 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.034266027858 0.0758088955206 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0608036263202 0.150359130593 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0262145017035 0.0667264976115 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.