Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Government officials are one of the important units of any country. Government officials work for country's welfare and for propagation growth of the country. The officials must analyses the each judgment because it is not wise for any government and its officials to "unquestioningly" accept the demands of its people. In my opinion I mostly agree with the given statement mainly owing the word "unquestioningly". The following paragraphs present the points to strengthen my stance.
Firstly, who work in a particular place he knows the reality of that place, similarly the governmental officials are experienced, and they know what is important and what is worst for the country. They are expert in policy making and have great knowledge of working at the position. They are working from long-term to serve the nation, so they have idea how to enhance the development of country. For example, monetary policies such as interest rate and inflation control are best understood by expert official. No one can take such important decisions. In democratic country like in India the government officials are administrative officers and they have vast knowledge about working and they must take decision with analysis and they can't rely on the public elected ministries to follow their decision unquestioningly.
Secondly, sometimes fortunately crisis come in the country and government must take decision in short time then government don't have time to take public opinion. In this situation government take decision with consultation with expert officials and retired expertise to save the nation. For example, any climatic disaster hit in any city of the nation and government official took decision to save the people with releasing orders to armed forces. Additionally, in economic situation the government officials decided the rate of tax with analysis of economic situation. The public of any nation want to save tax and governmental officials can't plan tax policies on public opinion unquestioning. So, the government official should rely on their own analyzed judgement.
Finally, the governmental officials are elected on the basis of experience and knowledge. They get training to work on important position which influence the country, whereas people are all rounder in comparison and they can't take decision in every field accurately. However, we can't rely on an individual because may be official took decision for their benefits, but people have freedom to speak in their fundamental rights. People can oppose such downside schemes and force to rethink on the policy. To accept people's idea unreasoning is more dangerous than governmental officials because officer have responsibility of the nation.
At the end by summing up the discussion, the government should not accept the people's idea unquestioningly because people don't have in-depth knowledge. The governmental officials have expert knowledge about their field and they must work with full positive.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 738, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...st take decision with analysis and they cant rely on the public elected ministries t...
^^^^
Line 5, column 124, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... decision in short time then government dont have time to take public opinion. In th...
^^^^
Line 5, column 640, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... to save tax and governmental officials cant plan tax policies on public opinion unq...
^^^^
Line 7, column 109, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'working'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'train' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: working
...rience and knowledge. They get training to work on important position which influence t...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 222, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... are all rounder in comparison and they cant take decision in every field accurately...
^^^^
Line 7, column 280, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... in every field accurately. However, we cant rely on an individual because may be of...
^^^^
Line 9, column 79, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...n, the government should not accept the peoples idea unquestioningly because people don...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 123, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...les idea unquestioningly because people dont have in-depth knowledge. The government...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, however, may, second, secondly, similarly, so, then, whereas, for example, in short, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 12.9106741573 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2539.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 462.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49567099567 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63618218583 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24430860346 2.79657885939 116% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.463203463203 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 801.9 704.065955056 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.3219123886 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.791666667 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.70833333333 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213482115691 0.243740707755 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0676193358437 0.0831039109588 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489400984732 0.0758088955206 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132525582352 0.150359130593 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0243737168021 0.0667264976115 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.1639044944 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.