Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The notion that the government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than carry out the will of the people they serve highlights the difficulty of decision making in politics. The role of the government official is to serve and represent the citizens' concerns, but this, in fact, may sway the official's position that may counter the right judgment that the government official may have. Considering both sides of the argument, the government official is elected by the citizens; hence, the citizens trust that the government officials will make the right judgment concerning the will of the people impacting for the better society and well-being.
In order to become a government official, the candidate must prepare intensively before entering the government. The combination of education, work experience, and leadership capability measures the official's preparedness and execution of the duties that the government aims to serve its public. For example, the government official may be required to pass the civil service exams that are incredibly difficult without studying arduously and intensely. The motivation, dedication, and the drive to pass the civil service exam extends to the same intrinsic quality to serve the public as well. As a result, the government official's goal to achieve the will of the people shows through their work ethic.
Furthermore, the government officials are actively engaged with the community prior to their election; hence, the constant contact and dialogue exchanged with the community allow the officials to determine the needs of the citizens firsthand. For example, in order to become the President of the United States, the candidate visits various rallies, universities, and communities to have the one-on-one interaction that the citizens hope to express and inform the government official to acknowledge. When selecting which agendas or priorities to be of importance when elected into office, the president-elect will have the determination as to decide which judgment will be of the most benefit for the citizens. Consequently the experience of the government officials becomes ever more important because their experience may create the best judgment for the people.
Moreover, although the government officials may be criticized if they make the wrong judgment, they were still selected into the position as they have prepared for the both the positive and negative consequences that come forth to serve the citizens. For instance, when the financial crisis occurred in2008, President Bush had an immense workload during his presidency to recover the slowed economy across the world. As the United States is one of the major economic power, the world was depending on actions of the President to save the large financial institutions through bailout. At the expense of the taxpayer's money, the large financial institutions were saved that in turn saved the U.S. economy from collapsing. The judgment has both favorable and adverse consequences, but the citizen's trust for the government official lead to the actions that had profound impact in the financial sector particularly. The opportunity cost of decision making comes as the government official needs to make a wise choice that will be more beneficial than without taking the action.
In conclusion, the government officials should rely on their judgments when making decisions that will benefit the citizens at most. Although some may dislike the decisions that the government official makes, the citizens at large may benefit greatly from the judgments as the officials are engaged in various high level advisors who help them make the best judgment as possible.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 200, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'officials'' or 'official's'?
Suggestion: officials'; official's
... and leadership capability measures the officials preparedness and execution of the dutie...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 711, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Consequently,
...e of the most benefit for the citizens. Consequently the experience of the government offici...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 485, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... of the major economic power, the world was depending on actions of the President to save the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 607, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'taxpayers'' or 'taxpayer's'?
Suggestion: taxpayers'; taxpayer's
... through bailout. At the expense of the taxpayers money, the large financial institutions...
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'consequently', 'first', 'furthermore', 'hence', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'still', 'well', 'as to', 'for example', 'for instance', 'in conclusion', 'in fact', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.269230769231 0.240241500013 112% => OK
Verbs: 0.149038461538 0.157235817809 95% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0625 0.0880659088768 71% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0320512820513 0.0497285424764 64% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0192307692308 0.0444667217837 43% => OK
Prepositions: 0.116987179487 0.12292977631 95% => OK
Participles: 0.0336538461538 0.0406280797675 83% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.85752525698 2.79330140395 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0336538461538 0.030933414821 109% => OK
Particles: 0.00160256410256 0.0016655270985 96% => OK
Determiners: 0.160256410256 0.0997080785238 161% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0304487179487 0.0249443105267 122% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0208333333333 0.0148568991511 140% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3696.0 2732.02544248 135% => OK
No of words: 574.0 452.878318584 127% => OK
Chars per words: 6.43902439024 6.0361032391 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.89472135074 4.58838876751 107% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.41637630662 0.366273622748 114% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.350174216028 0.280924506359 125% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.275261324042 0.200843997647 137% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.191637630662 0.132149295362 145% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85752525698 2.79330140395 102% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 219.290929204 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.445993031359 0.48968727796 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 53.0923083982 55.4138127331 96% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6194690265 97% => OK
Sentence length: 28.7 23.380412469 123% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3323092612 59.4972553346 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 184.8 141.124799967 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7 23.380412469 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.85 0.674092028746 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.21349557522 77% => OK
Readability: 63.7174216028 51.4728631049 124% => OK
Elegance: 2.096 1.64882698954 127% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.545646150208 0.391690518653 139% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.187440266588 0.123202303941 152% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0715856201475 0.077325440228 93% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.741710583084 0.547984918172 135% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0897193472445 0.149214159877 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.317562878621 0.161403998019 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0816046384754 0.0892212321368 91% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.7010354 0.385218514788 182% => Paragraphs have same ideas.
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0675045600913 0.0692045440612 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.438221452064 0.275328986314 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0622971630004 0.0653680567796 95% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.4325221239 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.30420353982 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88274336283 82% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 7.22455752212 125% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.70907079646 148% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.5995575221 118% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.