Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Bureaucracy is a huge network of goverment officials that have the primary function of executing the administrative functions of the government. I mostly agree with the assertion made by the given prompt that the government officials should use their own thinking to carry our their functions rather than being influenced by the public demand and will, primarily because of two reasons enlisted below. However, I do concede that there can be a few exceptions because the primary function of the government officials is to serve the public.
First of all, The government officials assigned with a certain task should rely on their own judgement because they are the one who have the power and authority from the government to execute the particular task within proper protocols. The norms and rules defined in various documents are the main basis on which the tasks of the government officials rely on, and the officials are mostly well aware of those norms. For example, in the transport office that assigns the driving permits, there usually is a huge crowd of people to request the issuance of the permit even though they failed the driving test. However, it is only wise of the officials not to be affected by the public pressure and do as mentioned in the rules by denying the permit if the candidate failed the test. The proper judgement of the officials help to maintain the impartiality in operation. This is essential for sound executation of numerous governmental day to day functions.
Moreover, usually it is understood my many that the will or demand of the general public are sometimes driven by emotions and not necessarily be valid all the time. For instance, a person who just broke the traffic signal might argue that he/ she was in hurry to attend an important meeting. However, the traffic official in the site simply can not neglect the fact that the person just broke a signal and endangered the lives of other nearby people as well. On contrary, if the official becomes liberal and let the person go, that could establish a rather long lasting impression of unrequired flexibility and the people might exploit it in a long run. So, it is very essential for the responsible government officials to maintain their stance and act firm according to their judgment to ensure that the systematic rule.
Admittedly, there could be a few exceptions where the officials could be a bit flexible, albeit maintaining their integrity. For instance, the government officials in immigration can allow the violation of the queue to allow fast service to the elderly citizen or even allow him/ her to fast forward the process, upon request. There can be some other cases of these will or demand of people that can be served without violating the existing rules and norms.
To conclude, due to two major reasons described in above paragraphs, I mostly agree that the government officials should be firm and unyielding in their duty, without being influenced by the will or demand of public. However, they can be a bit flexible in a few of innocuous and genuine cases while remaining within their realm of veracity and integrity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Bureaucracy is a huge network of goverme...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t officials is to serve the public. First of all, The government officials a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... governmental day to day functions. Moreover, usually it is understood my ma...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 83, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... my many that the will or demand of the general public are sometimes driven by emotions and no...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to ensure that the systematic rule. Admittedly, there could be a few excepti...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ating the existing rules and norms. To conclude, due to two major reasons de...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, so, well, while, for example, for instance, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2616.0 2235.4752809 117% => OK
No of words: 529.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94517958412 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79583152331 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68482116596 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.457466918715 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 821.7 704.065955056 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7096511794 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.684210526 118.986275619 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8421052632 23.4991977007 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52631578947 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216536330586 0.243740707755 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0652065668687 0.0831039109588 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570438516246 0.0758088955206 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122221038706 0.150359130593 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378961745446 0.0667264976115 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 100.480337079 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.