Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The service of government officials is founded on their willingness to serve those who have appointed them into the position of power. The prompt recommends that rather than carrying out the will of the people they govern unquestionably, they should rely on their judgement. In my opinion, I disagree and argue that the government should not only just listen to their people, but carry out the will of the people for the two reasons.
The success of any government officials lies in the satisfaction of their people. Thus, he or she should endeavour to carry out the will of the people in order to ensure a free-hitch tenure in the leadership position. For instance, if the constituent a government official represents is in need of amenities for the betterment of then people he or she represent, it is the duty of the government official to see to their concern and that their needs are being met. Any official government with whom the people are not happy with will have troubles serving such people. This is the reason they were appointed; to make sure the people are satisfied with their political decision which will ultimatley affect. Governmental position is a position of service. Government officials must understand that their appointment is that of a responsibilty to their people and not to themselves.
Secondly, The consequences and rewards of the choices of governmental officials is owned by the people they govern. Thsu, the government officials should listen and carry out the will of the people they represent since the people will be the ones bearing the consequences and rewards of their decisions.
Of course, there is a limit to the extent to which government officials should unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve. A leader must have a foresight amongst all virtue to know if a decision that is to be implemented is in favour of the betterment of their people. Unless the will of the people is within the bounds of the law, the government officials should heed to the will of the people. If a decision will be break law, the government officials should not rely on the judgement of the people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 353, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'represents'.
Suggestion: represents
...the betterment of then people he or she represent, it is the duty of the government offic...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, secondly, so, then, thus, for instance, of course, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1785.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 365.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8904109589 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84609406983 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 215.323595506 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.402739726027 0.4932671777 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 535.5 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4011718588 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.5625 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8125 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0625 5.21951772744 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.404984342386 0.243740707755 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165453747678 0.0831039109588 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100952485312 0.0758088955206 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.288126228191 0.150359130593 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343999533327 0.0667264976115 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 100.480337079 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.