Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Government officials are to officiate the people. Their purpose is to help build the nation by solving the issues of people that are in problem. The prompt suggests that government officials should be firm on their own judgement rather than carrying out the will of people they serve. I mostly disagree with the given statement and argue that the government officials, must carry out the will of people they are designated to work for.
To begin, Government officials are workers of the government that are elected by the people, for the people and to the people. So, they must carry out the things that the people want the most. As, doing so connects the government with the people. And, the problems, solutions, priority of the people of any locality is identified. This helps in strengthening and smooth performance of any development work. For an instance, when a government official implements the project to build the road that passes through the village and swipes away few of the houses in the way. In such situation the outrage of people is unconditional and is justified as well. However, when the similar project is passed and road is constructed, by taking consent of villagers and giving additional fundings to those, whose houses will be swiped in the process, will motivate the them and working is done efficiently.
In democracy, the people are the ultimate thriving force. So, when the government officials, representative of government - elected by people, do not perform to satisfy the people then they are criticized and even get evoked from their duties. Recently, one of the Police officer-in charge of Siraha district got suspended from his duty, as he was unpleasing to the local leaders of that district and always followed his intuition. Had he been more congruous and open to the opinions of the people, it would not have happened.
Some might argue that the will of people vary with time and situation, so the one with authority must do what is right for locality even if the opinions contradict. Government official is given the authority and resources to utilise. So, they could control those who revolt against the implementation on issue that government is dealing. For an instance, when people rallied against the monarchy of Nepal the government officials were doing their duty to protect the monarch even at the cost of their lives.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 852, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'them'?
Suggestion: the; them
...be swiped in the process, will motivate the them and working is done efficiently. In de...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, then, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1976.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 396.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9898989899 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70193141121 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494949494949 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 604.8 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.9470254122 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.35 5.21951772744 26% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235026225233 0.243740707755 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0809498594042 0.0831039109588 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0748013467092 0.0758088955206 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16670381421 0.150359130593 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102929161583 0.0667264976115 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.