People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
Humans are the superior animals in the taxonomy of the animal kingdom, not because they are stronger but for their ability to make rational decisions throughout the history. The prompt suggests that the decision based on the emotions and its logical explanation later indicates the poor decision maker. In my opinion, I mostly agree with the given statement for the following reasons.
Firstly, the rational decision makers are the leaders and vice-verse. For an instance, during the elcetion, if the a so called leader makes a decision fully based on the emotion ignoring the pros, cons and after maths of that decision. And, to earn vote reconciles with the public sentiments. But later on when he fails to deliver on the word he has given then starts blaming the opposition or the previous government for his incability to deliver. On, the other hand the voters, who made decision to vote without proper inquery and investigating the personality of their leaders are also to blame as they made a poor decision to elect a irresponsible person as their leader.
Secondly, the decisions of an individual considering all the after maths are signs of good decision makers. For an instance, before investing hard earned money an individual has to think multiple times. So, the investment in future, when in need, might yield for the betterment of an individual. As, there will be no turning back once the investment is made. This is how life works, at some point you will have world on your feet but a single bad decision will collapse our empire.
Lastly, decisions based on the emotion and later justification to it are not always poor. For an instance, consider a highly successful business women, who is smart, sharp and works deligently, and deservs all the credit in the world. However, if she gets pregnant and suppose she gives birth to twins or triplets. Then, who in the world will argue if she decides to enjoy her motherhood and maybe take a break and make professional sacrifices for her children.
In conclusion, humans make and are capable of making decisions, that could be emotional or rational. The point is that the good reasoning and emotional decisions are valid sometimes. However, it should not be forgotten that rational decisions today are the ones that yields in future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 112, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: the; a
...or an instance, during the elcetion, if the a so called leader makes a decision fully...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 637, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...e as they made a poor decision to elect a irresponsible person as their leader. ...
^
Line 5, column 223, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...hink multiple times. So, the investment in future, when in need, might yield for the bett...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 275, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ecisions today are the ones that yields in future.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, then, as to, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1919.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 387.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95865633075 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66247442038 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 604.8 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.3703906048 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.95 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.35 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.21951772744 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29325673285 0.243740707755 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0922947903344 0.0831039109588 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.079637605664 0.0758088955206 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17135414585 0.150359130593 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453240288373 0.0667264976115 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.