GOVERNMENT SHOULD FOCUS ON SOLVING IMMEDIATE PROBLEMS OF TODAY RATHER THAN ON TRYING TO SOLVE THE ANTICIPATED PROBLEMS OF THE FUTURE
We know that the government plays a fundamental role in governing a country, which is in dominance by the will of the citizens and so the citizens also play a key role in efficient working of the government likewise the government should also work with full efficacy to serve their citizens. The statement suggests that the problems faced today should be prioritized first compared to future problems to which in my perception I mostly agree and to corroborate that with the following reasons.
First of all, as the government serves the citizens of the country it should hear the voice of their citizens and work with accordance. If the citizens are facing a problem which needs exigent action then there is no meaning of considering anticipating problems. For example, if there are increased number of accidents in the country due to clemency in traffic rules then the priority should be to make stringent rules which compels the citizens to follow it and the anticipating problem like recalcitrance of few citizens towards strict rules should be over-ruled and main focus should be on mitigation of number of accidents on road.
Secondly, in many cases there are chances that the government should consider the anticipating problems which may hinder or harm more in the future because the panacea for today might seem hindrance for tomorrow. For example, if a country is facing a steep decline in economy or going through recession then the clear solution to alleviate the condition is to reduce the amount of taxes and give enough amount of loans at reduced interest so the flow of money in the market reinforces and eventually the economy ameliorates. This might seem tempting but this decision might hinder in future because if people get inured to such benefits which are there for ephemeral period or just for recovery of the economy to normal, and when the taxes and interest rates gets to normal then it might create problems to many.
Finally, in many cases there are chances that today’s problem might be beneficial in long term or might outstrip the problem with its benefits. For example, lets consider governmental scheme of life insurance for people living below poverty line, in this scheme the citizens who fall under below poverty line category are allowed to get a fixed amount of money from government for there treatment in hospitals. To which they have to pay back the money in installment without any interest. In this scheme the amount of money to be invested at ones is resolved but the amount needs to be paid back which is a long term loan.
So to conclude, the decisions taken by the government should be thoroughly evaluated with regards to present as well as future to which it is concomitant. The demanding problems should be considered in priority and problems which “might” hinder should be prioritized second.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 137, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...heir citizens and work with accordance. If the citizens are facing a problem which...
^^
Line 5, column 570, Rule ID: MAIN_FOCUS[1]
Message: Use simply 'focus'.
Suggestion: focus
...s strict rules should be over-ruled and main focus should be on mitigation of number of ac...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 342, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...poverty line category are allowed to get a fixed amount of money from government ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, likewise, may, second, secondly, so, then, well, for example, as well as, first of all, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2400.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 480.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68069463864 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72136607852 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.447916666667 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 751.5 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 23.0359550562 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 85.1204728485 60.3974514979 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 171.428571429 118.986275619 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.2857142857 23.4991977007 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 5.21951772744 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21549949131 0.243740707755 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.091367821315 0.0831039109588 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0701983865813 0.0758088955206 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141077652948 0.150359130593 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459436048812 0.0667264976115 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.3 14.1392134831 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.97 48.8420337079 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 12.1743820225 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.8971910112 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 11.2143820225 139% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.