Government should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition
Education is a fundamental need of every human being at the present time. A clock without a correct timing and a human without consent and knowledge are regarded the same. The prompt suggests that no person should be denied education and this opinion ought to be supported by the government. In my opinion, I strongly agree with this suggestion and argue that the government should pose free university education for those who cannot afford the tuition for the following three reasons.
To begin with, diligent students might back off from the opportunity of persuading higher education due to the financial crisis. A middle-class family with moderate income might not be able to support for the exhausting university tuition. Any effort from the government to lessen the burden will be a pathway for all students to persuade higher education. There won’t be any dropouts, thus a better country with scholar citizens. Countries like Germany, Denmark, Sweden, etc have free education for all students. It is clear to evaluate from the country progress regarding what a fully literate country can do itself and for its future betterment.
Further, free university education thus offered by the government itself will be a giant step in impeding the privatization of education at all levels. It is certain with the current facts that, educational institutes are the hub for business expansion and territory broadening. A rule from the government for offering free education will be a breakthrough for the families and for the students who will not have to dive into the sea of debt for obtaining costly higher education degrees. Moreover, government institutions will be regarded as a hub for quality education as most of the students will be attracted to the scheme. This scenario not only promotes the governmental institution but also compels for the betterment and quality enhancement of education level.
Lastly, students are the asset of a country. Any contribution from a single youth determines the future for the coming time. No person should be devoid of education. Educating the youth directly affects the impact they are going to have into the economy with their knowledge and skills. What a government invests shall reap with the contribution a nation is going to have. A country leaps with the knowledge of its people and their effort and this can only be achieved with an educated community and nation.
Therefore, education neither shall be quantified into numbers nor with the affordability of personnel. So the government should offer free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but also who cannot afford the tuition.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-10 | guozhishan | 58 | view |
| 2023-10-27 | Oladelejnrr | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-29 | nigarsafarova | 83 | view |
| 2023-08-24 | Afolakemi | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-09 | ZHOU0444 | 83 | view |
- Government should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition 50
- Students do not respect teachers as much as they did in the past 70
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts. 66
- Claim No act is done purely for the benefit of others 50
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state even if these areas could be developed for economic gain 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, lastly, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, thus, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 34.0 12.9106741573 263% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2243.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 434.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16820276498 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83243834913 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488479262673 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 706.5 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.3317527955 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5217391304 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8695652174 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.04347826087 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346892751104 0.243740707755 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111306217722 0.0831039109588 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.186408013946 0.0758088955206 246% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265979454209 0.150359130593 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.222515097088 0.0667264976115 333% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.