Governments are justified in circumventing civil laws when doing so is vital to the protection of national security?
It is said that governments can circumvent civil laws in certain and emergencies. I agree with this statement to some extent.
On the one hand, I can understand people who believe that civil laws should be respected by all individuals, even government servants. Laws are passed for the order of the city and people’s safety and no one has this right to ignore them. If governments want to circumvent civil laws, the trust of people will be misused, and they will discourage to follow rules. For example, most people disagree with the existence of video surveillance in public places because they believe this is an invasion of privacy, and they always feel that they are being watched by officials. In this situation government without the permission of people should not ignore the civil law, and it should use a video camera when people are satisfied wholeheartedly.
On the other hand, in some emergencies, governments can circumvent civil laws. I believe that some state servants such as people who work in hospitals or fire stations and police stations can have this right to ignore laws because of the welfare of individuals. For example, driving regulation is one of the civil laws that should be respected, and offenders are punished when they commit a crime. Traffic light in big cities is very important, and people are forced to pay attention to it. In some emergency, for instance, when someone has a health problem, and they need an ambulance, the driver of the ambulance is allowed to pass the red light. This is just to rescue people’s lives. Or to provide people’s safety, police officers have this right to carry a gun. In this way, they can deter offenders to commit crimes and help people to feel safe. I believe, these situations are exceptional and there no problem that government staff to circumvent civil laws.
To summarize, in my view, civil laws should be respected by all individuals, and governments should be allowed to circumvent the laws just in emergencies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 748, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...en people are satisfied wholeheartedly. On the other hand, in some emergencies, ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, for example, for instance, such as, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1672.0 2235.4752809 75% => OK
No of words: 337.0 442.535393258 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96142433234 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82943870632 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 215.323595506 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.46884272997 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.77640449438 450% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.6356868794 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3529411765 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8235294118 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.29411764706 5.21951772744 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189074513201 0.243740707755 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0805944410443 0.0831039109588 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0798659353372 0.0758088955206 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157915437295 0.150359130593 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0229586209982 0.0667264976115 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 100.480337079 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.