Governments officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reason

Essay topics:

Governments officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position

In government officials, there are many departments that all have their own profession to cope with different questions. However, in my opinion, I consider that governments officials should rely on their own judgement in most fields, while in some special fields they should carry out the will of the people they serve.
In most fields, government officials can have a more accurate way to manage the issue. For example, When the country faces the financial issue, the member in the financial department may not only have more professional knowledge of finance but also experience more issue so that they can make the decision which has few impacts to the country. In Taiwan, after the covid-19 outbreak, many tourism industries have huge damage because all the visitors disappear due to the policy. It also influences many other occupations and becomes a financial problem. Thus, the financial department adopts the way which gives all citizen coupon to galvanize the business market.
Also in other fields such as politics, every time the country is confronted with a diplomatic crisis, the diplomatic department can find a way quickly to solve the problem to avoid the crisis become terrible. Taiwan and China have many conflicts currently. To make a harmonious society, our Government officials cost lost of mind to sustain the safety situation. They can not easily accept their citizen view because most citizens do not really realize how to manage the diplomatic problem. If the problem does not discreetly face, it may cause an unfortunate result.
However, some fields such as comrade issue that government officials should rely on the will of the people they serve. Because the issue is only for the citizens and it does not need too much professional knowledge to discuss. All the people in this country have an opinion to express their view. Therefore, Taiwan holds a referendum to decide whether the comrade can marry in Taiwan. Fortunately, over half of the people who accept the comrade have the right to get marry in Taiwan. It is a good paradigm for carrying out the will of the people they serve.
In my opinion, I consider they government officials should decide the way depends on the field

Votes
Average: 5.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 130, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... cope with different questions. However, in my opinion, I consider that governmen...
^^
Line 5, column 89, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...als should decide the way depends on the field
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, really, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, such as, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 19.5258426966 20% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1847.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 367.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03269754768 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62037520623 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485013623978 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.4695402486 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2105263158 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3157894737 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26315789474 5.21951772744 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19539634189 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0646294222244 0.0831039109588 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0731374628955 0.0758088955206 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130786031922 0.150359130593 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0805581708974 0.0667264976115 121% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.