Governments officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve

Essay topics:

Governments officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve.

The speaker make a threshold claim that government officials should rely particularly on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve. I strongly concede with the speaker claim that those persons who are engaged in government jobs must have strong capability to take justifiable decision during their working tenure rather than aiming views and suggestions from the general public.
Turning to the first threshold claim that government personnel are the representative of the governing bodies. Due to this reason, they have to carry out their duties effectively using their own caliber without creating partiality towards the citizens. As a result, the general public will always feel the presence of laws and order within the community area. For instance, people who are involved in government jobs must resolve the local tension arising within the community looking at the situation around that circumstances. On doing so, the chaotic condition in the society will never rise up. Thus, strong determination and powerful social well-being must be there within an government personnel so as to create equitable environment within the society.
Turning to the second threshold claim that government individuals without having capacity on taking wise decisions will never win the heart of the local citizens living in that working area. As a result, the trust put forward by the people will be lost. This will obviously create some sort of distance between the government officials and general public. Due to these reason, the endurance of any projects designed by government will never be institutionalized. For instance, in the project of hydro power, if the government officials don't understand the sentiments of the local people living in the projects, then at that time, it is obvious that this projects will definitely become failure. Therefore, every government personnel should rely on their own judgment while carrying out their duties.
Some may argue that without the advocacy of the general public, governing bodies will be halted on designing various mega projects on the local area. For instance, while designing various projects, at first there must be fully support towards that programs by the general public. The reason behind this is that the longevity of any projects is only instilled if the various information and suggestions about the local area is provided by the people towards the government. Therefore, with such information, it will facilitate the government to save the programs from the perfidious results. However, this point is flawed since without taking heady suggestions from technical officials, any programs won't achieve its success. Believing in the general public for the mega projects doesn't sound appropriate because they don't know and understand about the structural, topographical and technical aspects of the programs which they are going to design. Therefore, the wise and justifiable decision should be carry out by the government officials at the current instant of time.
All in all if the above factors are contemplated we can easily reason that government individuals should carry out wise decision in the communal area without creating bias situation to the citizen. While in some cases, they should also take the will of the people for the perpetuity of the programs.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 13, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'makes'.
Suggestion: makes
The speaker make a threshold claim that government offic...
^^^^
Line 1, column 413, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...n aiming views and suggestions from the general public. Turning to the first threshold claim ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 270, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... towards the citizens. As a result, the general public will always feel the presence of laws ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 284, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...itizens. As a result, the general public will always feel the presence of laws an...
^^
Line 2, column 679, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... social well-being must be there within an government personnel so as to create eq...
^^
Line 2, column 703, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...be there within an government personnel so as to create equitable environment within the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 340, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ce between the government officials and general public. Due to these reason, the endurance of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 536, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ydro power, if the government officials dont understand the sentiments of the local ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...le carrying out their duties. Some may argue that without the advocacy of the genera...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 49, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... argue that without the advocacy of the general public, governing bodies will be halted on des...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 187, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a. For instance, while designing various projects, at first there must be fully s...
^^
Line 4, column 265, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ly support towards that programs by the general public. The reason behind this is that the lo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 306, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eneral public. The reason behind this is that the longevity of any projects is on...
^^
Line 4, column 516, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...herefore, with such information, it will facilitate the government to save the pr...
^^
Line 4, column 745, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...t achieve its success. Believing in the general public for the mega projects doesnt sound appr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 782, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...he general public for the mega projects doesnt sound appropriate because they dont kno...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 820, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...s doesnt sound appropriate because they dont know and understand about the structura...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, look, may, second, so, still, then, therefore, thus, well, while, as to, for instance, sort of, as a result, in some cases

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 58.6224719101 131% => OK
Nominalization: 29.0 12.9106741573 225% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2840.0 2235.4752809 127% => OK
No of words: 529.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36862003781 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79583152331 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78155415828 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.4404536862 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 867.6 704.065955056 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5698319744 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.47826087 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4347826087 5.21951772744 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 17.0 7.80617977528 218% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.38751503061 0.243740707755 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123549668356 0.0831039109588 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.149484935785 0.0758088955206 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253435401748 0.150359130593 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118199604975 0.0667264976115 177% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 14.1392134831 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 100.480337079 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.