Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The government is facing a plethora of issues. hence the decision to spend their focus and resources in dealing with immediate problems or the long-term problem plays a crucial role in the effective operation of the government. some people said that they should mainly focus on instant issues rather than the anticipated one. I hardly agree with the above statement for the three following reasons.
First, the prevention of some issues such as diseases is the best way to save money and effort in comparison to the curing diseases after it breaks out. The facts have shown a plethora of case that prevention play in a crucial role in helping human fighting against the attracts of virus, bacteria. If the vaccination program for Liver type C is not carried out, the thousand of people per country might struggle with this disease. As a result, patients have to pour a huge amount of their budget in hospitalization while the government has to invest larger number of doctors, drugs, and nurses... in curing these patients and lack of such resources for other immediate problems that cannot be prevented, such as natural disaster, or unemployees. The example clearly demonstrates the necessity for acts that prevent anticipate problems in order to reduce it magnitude in damage in citizen's health, budget, and national resources.
Second, investment in solving anticipated problems not only help the country minimized its negative effects but also bring beneficial effect to the whole society. Let take education as a typical example. Many people assumed that investment for education is investing for a better future. it is absolutely right. The amount money which is spent on schools, universities, students today, is not only a good method to solve problems related to the low-educated status such as shop-lifter, liter, high rate of criminal, but also raise people knowledge base. For the long term, such well-educated people could contribute a significant for the development of society in the economy, science, technology, art... hence, the investment for the future, for the anticipated problem never be unwise choice.
In conclusion, the government should spend its focus on not only instant issues, but also future issues because it is a saver in time and budget expense in preventing rather than in curing
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 48, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Hence
...ernment is facing a plethora of issues. hence the decision to spend their focus and r...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 48, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: hence,
...ernment is facing a plethora of issues. hence the decision to spend their focus and r...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 229, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
... effective operation of the government. some people said that they should mainly foc...
^^^^
Line 5, column 289, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ation is investing for a better future. it is absolutely right. The amount money w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, second, so, well, while, as to, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1950.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 375.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79447836516 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 612.0 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.450703506 60.3974514979 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.333333333 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.21951772744 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201941818699 0.243740707755 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0572786611081 0.0831039109588 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511653848477 0.0758088955206 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129127283498 0.150359130593 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0574710210275 0.0667264976115 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.