Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
With the current technological advances and the growing population of the world, there has been a dramatic increase in both current issues as well as future issues. It is important for the government to focus on solving the immediate problems as they are currently affecting lives of millions of people but they should not avert their focus from anticipated future problems. And so, i strongly disagree with the recommendation and would like to support my stance with the following reasons.
First of all, every government has a scheme or a plan for the upcoming five years or ten years and they have been elected based on these plans. These plans outline how they will solve the current issues in the society as well as work towards the development of the nation. If they just focus on solving the immediate issues, there might not be a positive economical growth of a country. Thus, its not recommended to turn a blind eye towards anticipated problems as they might aid in the development and growth of the country.
Secondly, the resources that are currently being used and depleted may not present an issue immediately, but over time, the resources might become sparse. The government has to focus on this and try to come up with solutions to use the resources efficiently and also invest in finding alternate sources. If they do not try to solve such issues when it is at its root, it may become a cataclysm.
Finally, I would like to add that there are possibilities of unpredictable catastrophes and measures should be taken to mitigate the effect of these. Suddenly, there might be a naturally caused disaster such as flood or a tsunami or man-made disaster like wars and if proper precautions had been taken, the lives of many people can be saved from these disasters. But, if the government had focused only on solving current issues such as poverty, lack of work, etc, when a problem suddenly arises they might not have the means to solve it or reduce its effects.
To conclude, I would say that it is necessary for the governments to focus on solving the immediate problems of today but at the same time they should also focus on the predicting problems that might arise in the future as well as come up with a solution for these problems. One can argue that there might be numerous problems that might not be anticipated but that's the main reason why its important to focus on the various possibilities and as the famous saying goes 'Precaution is better than cure'.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...ramatic increase in both current issues as well as future issues. It is important for the ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 355, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...e issues, there might not be a positive economical growth of a country. Thus, its not reco...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 401, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'recommended turning'.
Suggestion: recommended turning
...ical growth of a country. Thus, its not recommended to turn a blind eye towards anticipated problem...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 341, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n, the lives of many people can be saved from these disasters. But, if the govern...
^^
Line 5, column 361, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...blems that might not be anticipated but thats the main reason why its important to fo...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, well, as to, such as, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2050.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 432.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74537037037 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65874192198 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.460648148148 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 647.1 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.1719143623 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.666666667 118.986275619 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8 23.4991977007 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.21951772744 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237039418304 0.243740707755 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0884823356468 0.0831039109588 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072825113278 0.0758088955206 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146991408969 0.150359130593 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0637474575266 0.0667264976115 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.