Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Any problem-solving strategy must be such that it must have a remedy of both the problems of present as well as future problems. The prompt discusses the role of government of a nation to prioritize the difficulties currently facing rather than giving more attention to unknown upcoming. However, I mostly disagree with the prompt and provide two reasons to verify that future problems are more important but, also present a few cases where today’s difficulties also must be given equal attention.
First of all, we must always understand that future problems are always unpredictable. There is also a saying that if we want to look bad side of any person or event, we must always go to the extreme. It might be possible that future problems will be pernicious compared to present. We can by taking some banal ways avoid hindrance that we are facing right now, but may not avoid and be a victim of debacle if we don’t consider some aspects precedent to the disaster. For example, global warming, at present, is in its embryonic stage. We can certainly avoid fueled transport, provide more filtration system to exhaust of industries even if they cost more; so, by present small effort we can mitigate something that cannot be controlled in future. Such cases must be determined by the government and actions must be taken correspondingly.
Secondly, government is a highest body of a nation and is inundated with farsighted people having the vision and knowledge much better than the ordinary people. So, it becomes the responsibility of the government no to think like a common people but have a meticulous regard to any obstacles and work according to it. For instance, the central government of Nepal, canceled the project of building international airport by destructing half of a national park. Of course, local people were happy that an international airport will be in their home town and were furious after the government decision. But it certainly serves good because airport could be made in other town or in some alternative convenient location but once devasted, national park is almost impossible to re-create. Thus, even the problems seem unknown to the citizen and they row over it, government must be cogent and work for an efficient development.
Although, some of the problems must be addressed immediately rather than waiting for future consequences. During this pandemic time of COVID-19, President Trump decided to interfere the protest regarding “black lives matter”, which is an obvious demand for right of nearly half of the United States citizen. But, the risk of spreading of the virus is more in crowd so interference by the government can be considered as a correct decision nevertheless, the decision was mocked by the citizens. In these types of cases government must have an immediate response and be ready for its implementation.
Thus, it can be concluded that even the future problems, often seem severe and government must be more heedful towards it; there will always be anomaly conditions where the authority must peruse present problems and solve it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 102, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... remedy of both the problems of present as well as future problems. The prompt discusses t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 738, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ate something that cannot be controlled in future. Such cases must be determined by the g...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 25, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...espondingly. Secondly, government is a highest body of a nation and is inundat...
^
Line 5, column 214, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...es the responsibility of the government no to think like a common people but have ...
^^
Line 7, column 11, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... an efficient development. Although, some of the problems must be addressed immediately ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 227, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t peruse present problems and solve it.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, regarding, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, of course, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 12.4196629213 193% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2602.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 510.0 442.535393258 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10196078431 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75217629947 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88130966847 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 265.0 215.323595506 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519607843137 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 818.1 704.065955056 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4879961587 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.904761905 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.7619047619 5.21951772744 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153659541589 0.243740707755 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0542802983733 0.0831039109588 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489098945868 0.0758088955206 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103350512655 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510992097255 0.0667264976115 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 100.480337079 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.