Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
In this world, every country has problems in their city and governments should indicate their recent problems in the city and besides that I also think that they should also focus on future actions which is anticipated. Because both issues are very essential steps to solve out for the betterment of our society. If we prioritize only one and neglect any one, then it may bring bad impact for our human life.
Firstly, it is true that recent problems are very needy to solve so that people can stay fine. But, authority should make the system like that in future it also can not make any disturbance in the society. For example, In Bangladesh village people tribal, they suffer every summer season lack of water usage. Consequently, it was hampering their life. Government are making several steps to help them with sufficient water source. But after same years, same problem is arising again and again. So, authority should maintain the system on the basis of future anticipated problem solving so that the with the system the recent problem and future arisen issue can be solved.
Secondly, day by day, people are using animals made luxurious products to enhance the beauties of their home. So, animals are now in endangered. But Government are focusing on that to get rid from that issue. But I think they should make the law so that in future no one can do such a crime. For example, in some places like Kalsi, in southern parts of the Nepal, where the punishments are very weak so after few days, the animal killing activities happening again. So, the authority should concern the future also and make the law much strict so that in future no body try to break their law.
In sum, authority should concern the most recent issues in the society but with that they also should remain concern about the future arisen issues which can bring bad impact for them. Especially, when they should aware of the system and make the designed system also future solving issue so that people can have peaceful life without any hazards. Again, with the future concern, the strict law should be maintained at present, so that any crime like can be prohibited.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 352, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anyone'?
Suggestion: anyone
.... If we prioritize only one and neglect any one, then it may bring bad impact for our h...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 287, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... tribal, they suffer every summer season lack of water usage. Consequently, it wa...
^^
Line 3, column 562, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'nobody'?
Suggestion: nobody
...e the law much strict so that in future no body try to break their law. In sum, autho...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 471, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... that any crime like can be prohibited.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, for example, i think, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1779.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 374.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75668449198 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26623325119 2.79657885939 81% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483957219251 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.4352033998 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6315789474 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6842105263 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26315789474 5.21951772744 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190795334389 0.243740707755 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06144238119 0.0831039109588 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600067681488 0.0758088955206 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131421183793 0.150359130593 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431401468281 0.0667264976115 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 100.480337079 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.