In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
In this new decades, some theories are being made on the based on past theories and those works has tremendous achievements in modern technology. However, in some other field, people can achieve the highest peak of the success without being influenced by the past ancestor’s glorious output.
In science field, we can see some experimental works theories are followed by past scientists theories. Now modern scientists just updated some works and would apply in the recent research lab which shows excel results. For example, in past scientist made silicon based solar cell which has major influences for renewable energy. But now scientists with the help of past work on solar cell, they developed new solar cell which has better output and this contribution turn in to whole over the world.
On the other hand, If we eyes back to the fields of arts. We can see, there are many artistic works which has brought great contributions and success to the world without inspired by old pinnacle of that particular area. For instance, the world famous architect Dr. Rafiqul Azam has been pioneer for his growing of sustainable green building design. Moreover this work is not done with the following of any past architectural events.
Additionally, in the science, there is an success which brought by past events. For example, todays airplane idea is driven by past two brothers, they are familiar with wrights brothers. With the inspiration of their work, people tried to fly in the sky and successfully made air plane to fly.
In conclusion, not all the fields are succeed by inspired by previous success. In artistic field people can achieve highest win without inspired by previous works. However, in some science field scientists need to follow and influenced by the previous output results and after applying those works newly scientists can achieve tremendous results which bring success in our life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 26, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'we' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'eye'
Suggestion: eye
...er the world. On the other hand, If we eyes back to the fields of arts. We can see,...
^^^^
Line 3, column 350, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...g of sustainable green building design. Moreover this work is not done with the followin...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 40, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... Additionally, in the science, there is an success which brought by past events. F...
^^
Line 7, column 39, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'succeeded'.
Suggestion: succeeded
... In conclusion, not all the fields are succeed by inspired by previous success. In art...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 109, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'achieve the highest'.
Suggestion: achieve the highest
...s success. In artistic field people can achieve highest win without inspired by previous works....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 313.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11821086262 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59842044927 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 215.323595506 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517571884984 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 704.065955056 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.7243923018 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.125 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5625 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6875 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209533996382 0.243740707755 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0791398271271 0.0831039109588 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0389176060955 0.0758088955206 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127515602569 0.150359130593 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0241762362695 0.0667264976115 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 100.480337079 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.