Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Scientific research brings helpful consequences to our society and researcher need funding to enhance their journey to the inventions. Moreover, scientific research output do not show instant results and it shows as unclear in beginning time but in future it has great contributions. So I do not agree with the statement that government should prohibit to fund scientific research where their consequences are not cogent.
Firstly, now a days researcher are thinking 100 % carbon free energy producing source and so they are doing research on renewable energy to make our society clean and safe. But, those inventors are still not sure about the results whether it can reduce carbon more precisely or not. However, they believe that if they can get funding from government and continue their research, they can obviously can make a change from the previous results and they can achieve a very favorable results. For example, in Hong Kong university researcher got a big amount of funding to research on perovskite solar cell to target the efficiency of 30%. Previously their research results were very poor condition but gradually they developed and they mad their goal and achieve the energy efficiency of 30% which is great contributions to our environment.
.Additionally, this worlds outer space is very vast and we can not get a stable results . Moreover, everyday new inventions are occurring and assumptions are changing on what basis researcher do further research. But still government should provide funding to them because it takes time and analysis to get a stable analysis. But in future we definitely would get a clear consequences. For instance, researcher are working on how there are other planet outside of our planet earth and if we can survive their and take any sources which are essential for our living people. Researcher believe that one day they can bring that answer to us.
On the other hand, If government do not invest on the research related where consequences are not transparent then it would can create a prohibition from great inventions. Moreover, without funding researcher can not go ahead their projects because it needs huge people involvements and they need to paid the hired researcher. Consequently, it it great barrier to create new testing of any research.
In sum, authority definitely should provide funding if they want to test out new research even though in initial state their consequences would be no clear. Because, if government open the investment door to the those fields, researcher can bring great impact for our environment which world make our world zero carbon free world and pollution free.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 10, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: nowadays
... consequences are not cogent. Firstly, now a days researcher are thinking 100 % carbon fr...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 16, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'days'' or 'day's'?
Suggestion: days'; day's
...quences are not cogent. Firstly, now a days researcher are thinking 100 % carbon fr...
^^^^
Line 2, column 241, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll not sure about the results whether it can reduce carbon more precisely or not....
^^
Line 2, column 481, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'result'?
Suggestion: result
...s and they can achieve a very favorable results. For example, in Hong Kong university r...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 838, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...great contributions to our environment. .Additionally, this worlds outer space is...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Additionally
...eat contributions to our environment. .Additionally, this worlds outer space is very vast a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 15, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ons to our environment. .Additionally, this worlds outer space is very vast and we ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 87, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...vast and we can not get a stable results . Moreover, everyday new inventions are o...
^^
Line 3, column 372, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'consequence'?
Suggestion: consequence
... future we definitely would get a clear consequences. For instance, researcher are working o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 446, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'planets'?
Suggestion: planets
...cher are working on how there are other planet outside of our planet earth and if we c...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 584, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'believes'.
Suggestion: believes
...ntial for our living people. Researcher believe that one day they can bring that answer...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 341, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: it
...aid the hired researcher. Consequently, it it great barrier to create new testing of ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, still, then, for example, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2225.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 431.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16241299304 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80885531736 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501160092807 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 673.2 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9549000795 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.105263158 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6842105263 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26315789474 5.21951772744 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 7.80617977528 154% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174076784273 0.243740707755 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0649372399017 0.0831039109588 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496252311029 0.0758088955206 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117841983713 0.150359130593 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417351278217 0.0667264976115 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.