Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The government of a nation has to perform multi-dimensional tasks for the country people. It has to deal with the existing challenges and prepare itself for the future battle. Here comes the priority issue: should the government focus on the immediate problems or solve the forecasted problems of the future? The prompt argues that government should prioritize day to day life problems than working for the unforeseeable future. I strongly disagree with the opinion and I would like to illustrate my positions with two specific examples.
First of all, the role of a government is completely different from the responsibilities of an individual. The government has to design solutions for the betterment of all citizens, not a specific group of people. The problems that seem intractable today might be a temporary issue and it may have lower impacts to the nation as a whole. On the other hand, it might have to deal with some severe issues that will be more daunting to face if they are not resolved now. For example, consider the COVID- 19 issue in Bangladesh: a developing country. The first wave was a hard time for this impoverished nation. Still the government called for country wise lockdown and forced people not to work outside. Many people started protection against the abrupt decision of the government claiming that they would not be the victim of COVID but the victim of starvation. The government was still stringent and released the lockdown effect once the people got vaccinated. Consequently, the death rate of the country by COVID is significantly low compared to the huge population it occupied. If the government focused on those temporary issues of workers unemployment and released the lockdown, the whole scenario may be debacle. From this discussion, we can assert that anticipating the weight of the future problems and working for it should be of greater importance to a government than to solve immediate problems.
Moreover, the government always works for the sovereignty of the nation: to prosper and flourish the growth of the nation. If the rulers only try to solve day to day life requirements, it can not change its' fate. Consider the example of Bangladesh government again. Bangladesh, after the independence in 1971 had an agriculture based economy. After the liberation, it had to face different issues regarding farming and crop productions. However, the government immediately could realize that if it could turn its' agriculture based economy to industrial revolution, the economic stagnation will be extirpated. Gradually it started to establish industries and more people started engaging in industry works leaving agricultural field works. After three decades, Bangladesh has become the 3rd highest RMG (Ready-made garments) exporting nations of the world and earned a huge revenue from the RMG exports. If the government during 1970s failed to anticipate the success of industrial revolution and focused to solve perpetual problems during that time, probably it would still lag behind the underdeveloped nations. From this demonstration, it can be inferred that government officials should have extra vision and work for it instead of dealing with anomalous regular problems.
To conclude, there is no doubt that government has the responsibility to improve the fortune of the nation. And if it is assessed in terms of working for the current problems or for the future prospects, I will certainly vote for the second one.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 609, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Still,
...hard time for this impoverished nation. Still the government called for country wise ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 920, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'during the 1970s'.
Suggestion: during the 1970s
...from the RMG exports. If the government during 1970s failed to anticipate the success of ind...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, second, so, still, as to, for example, no doubt, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 28.0 12.9106741573 217% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2918.0 2235.4752809 131% => OK
No of words: 558.0 442.535393258 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.229390681 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.86024933743 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9933873671 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 271.0 215.323595506 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485663082437 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 901.8 704.065955056 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 12.0 4.99550561798 240% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.4820089878 60.3974514979 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.620689655 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2413793103 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.21951772744 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208605060965 0.243740707755 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0570919289646 0.0831039109588 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712070229771 0.0758088955206 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14783159666 0.150359130593 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0662057895444 0.0667264976115 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 150.0 100.480337079 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.