National security takes the highest precedence over any thing and without guaranteeing a safe and secure life for it's citizens a government cannot prioritze arts equally or even close to military.
The author's recommendation to invest an equal amount of government resources towards art and military cannot be generalized to all the nations. Consider Israel, which is known for it's military technology, has faught various battles with it's neighours since it's inception in late 1940's and is still under constant threat. Can it prioritize any field apart from the ones required for sustenance, such as art or tourism? It cannot. India is known for diverse art forms nourished by it's diverse population and it has a huge border which is under constant threat from neighbouring countries and a coast line where it's shipping lines are under attack by various pirates. India spends a huge part of it's national budget to protect it's interests both on land and sea, though it has a huge population which is also impoverished. Such nations cannot be expected to invest an equal amount of resources for art given that their national security is under constant threat.
When we look back into history, post world war one all the allied and the axis nations have come to a pact that they would limit their military expenditure and also the size of their naval vessels. Britian and France adhered to it and when Hitler came into power, he ignored them and went his own way. In the initial phases of the second world war, Britain though being the larget navy was outcalssed and had faced severe damage. During the halcyon of the first world war, Britain spent a tremendous amount in pure sciences till the war knocked at their gate. With uncertainity around, any discrepancy in spending over military can be costly in the future.
But with more number of democratic nations, it is hard to expect war in regions of Western Europe and the governments which are richer can spend an equal amount on arts. Italy which is an economically stable and peaceful nation, can choose to spend on reviving the artistic presence which it had in the renaissance period and also benefit from the tourism which it can attract.
In summary the recommendation made cannot be generalized to all the nations and from history it is important to note that at any point of time national security must be prioritized over anything that does not keep us alive.
- Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits.Write a response in which you di88
- 41)Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answe76
- A pet food company recalled 4 million pounds of pet food in response to complaints that pets that had consumed the food experienced vomiting, lethargy, and other signs of illness. After the recall, the pet food company tested samples from the recalled foo51
- The council of Maple County, concerned about the county's becoming overdeveloped, is debating a proposed measure that would prevent the development of existing farmland in the county. But the council is also concerned that such a restriction, by limiting 89
- People who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are also the most critical of it.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 53, Rule ID: ANY_BODY
Message: Did you mean 'anything'?
...urity takes the highest precedence over any thing and without guaranteeing a safe and sec...
Line 4, column 5, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...lly or even close to military. The authors recommendation to invest an equal amoun...
Line 4, column 527, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...erse population and it has a huge border which is under constant threat from neig...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, second, so, still, apart from, in summary, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2021.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 413.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89346246973 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57135105194 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53995157385 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 636.3 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.9759644289 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.733333333 118.986275619 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5333333333 23.4991977007 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.21951772744 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12436304265 0.243740707755 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0425444244594 0.0831039109588 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0346244753182 0.0758088955206 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0687412580001 0.150359130593 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445315777812 0.0667264976115 67% => OK
automated_readability_index: 15.4 14.1392134831 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 48.8420337079 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 12.1743820225 103% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.