Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear.
In the modern era, humanity became a witness of the most outstanding advancement of modern technology. It is all because of research innovations that take place almost every day in every part of the world. It was only a century ago, when people were suspicious if research results would bring positive impact on quality life and were never involved in research works. Hence, government did not pay enough attention to scientific research whose outcomes were unclear. A government might not have thought that if they allocated enough funds, the results of scientific research maight have turned out to be useful at a later time, if not immediately. From my perspective, government should fund scientific research even if the consequences are opaque for a number of reasons.
A government might be afraid that unreasonable expenditure could be spent on something more rational such as healthcare or education of people of a country. This might be sensible from all perspectives, but, on the other hand, if to be brave, a big fortune might be spent for research because only scientific research can bring well being to the people of a country. To illustrate, thanks to scientific research in the field of medicine, people can prolong their lives through medicine that was not accessible due to lack of research works many decades ago. Diseases that were considered incurable a few decades ago, cancer, for example, can now be treated very easily. It is one of the main reasons governments should consider funding research even if it is not sure of positive results.
Since the advent of modern technology people's life became more mobile and flexible. For example, gadgets that expede people's connection through time and distance are the results of scientific research of many great minds. The discovery of cars, washing machines, and other technology that people use in their every day life are good examples why governments should fund scientific research. All aforementioned technology did not come in one day because they were funded from the very beginning, but after many years of hard work of scientists who were both in search of financial support and convinced that they were working for the good of people.
It is only through research that people can make progress. One invention or discovery leads to another. In most cases, discoveries are accidental and one cannot be sure if the outcome is clear. Government should consider funding any scientific research, even the results are unclear, otherwise no one will ever know if such scientific research has true potential to be realized and exploited.
In the modern era, humanity became a witness of the most outstanding advancement of modern technology. it is all because of research innovations that take place almost every day in every part of the world. it was only a century ago, when people were suspicious if research results would bring positive impact on quality life and were never involved in research works. Hence, government did not pay enough attention to scientific research whose outcomes were unclear. A government might not have thought that if they allocated enough funds, the results of scientific research maight have turned out to be useful at a later time, if not immediately. From my perspective, government should fund scientific research even if the consequences are opaque for a number of reasons.
A government might be afraid that unreasonable expenditure could be spent on something more rational such as healthcare or education of people of a country. This might be sensible from all perspectives, but, on the other hand, if to be brave, a big fortune might be spent for research because only scientific research can bring well being to the people of a country. To illustrate, thanks to scientific research in the field of medicine, people can prolong their lives through medicine that was not accessible due to lack of research works many decades ago. Diseases that were considered incurable a few decades ago, cancer, for example, can now be treated very easily. it is one of the main reasons governments should consider funding research even if it is not sure of positive results.
Since the advent of modern technology people's life became more mobile and flexible. For example, gadgets that expede people's connection through time and distance are the results of scientific research of many great minds. The discovery of cars, washing machines, and other technology that people use in their every day life are good examples why governments should fund scientific research. All aforementioned technology did not come in one day because they were funded from the very beginning, but after many years of hard work of scientists who were both in search of financial support and convinced that they were working for the good of people.
new roman"">it is only through research that people can make progress. one invention or discovery leads to another. In most cases, discoveries are accidental and one cannot be sure if the outcome is clear. government should consider funding any scientific research, even the results are unclear, otherwise no one will ever know if such scientific research has true potential to be realized and exploited.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 69, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...became a witness of the most outstanding advancement of modern technology. it is...
^^
Line 1, column 85, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of the most outstanding advancement of modern technology. it is all because of ...
^^
Line 1, column 106, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ing advancement of modern technology. it is all because of research innovations ...
^^
Line 1, column 209, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...t every day in every part of the world. it was only a century ago, when people we...
^^
Line 1, column 215, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y day in every part of the world. it was only a century ago, when people were sus...
^^
Line 1, column 418, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... government did not pay enough attention to scientific research whose outcomes we...
^^
Line 1, column 490, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...utcomes were unclear. A government might not have thought that if they allocated ...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... are opaque for a number of reasons. A government might be afraid that unreas...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 188, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ple of a country. This might be sensible from all perspectives, but, on the other...
^^
Line 3, column 680, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...xample, can now be treated very easily. it is one of the main reasons governments ...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... it is not sure of positive results. Since the advent of modern technology pe...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 211, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re the results of scientific research of many great minds. The discovery of cars,...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...were working for the good of people. new roman''>it is only through...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 8, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: New
...rking for the good of people. new roman''>it is only through re...
^^^
Line 7, column 69, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...>it is only through research that people can make progress. one invention or disc...
^^
Line 7, column 90, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
...esearch that people can make progress. one invention or discovery leads to another...
^^^
Line 7, column 225, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Government
...cannot be sure if the outcome is clear. government should consider funding any scientific ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 399, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntific research has true potential to be realized and exploited. ...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntial to be realized and exploited.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, so, well, for example, such as, in most cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2222.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 428.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19158878505 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8572502413 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497663551402 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 694.8 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4284501227 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.947368421 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5263157895 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.21052631579 5.21951772744 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 19.0 7.80617977528 243% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362758138124 0.243740707755 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121191250394 0.0831039109588 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111141624851 0.0758088955206 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232034113932 0.150359130593 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.138677172761 0.0667264976115 208% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.