Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Scientific research is an essential segment of scientific and social development today. The money governments commit to scientific research is constantly increasing every year. The prompt recommends that governments should not take any money to scientific research which will not have a clear result. In my opinion, I strongly disagree with this suggestion and argue that governments should fund scientific research that is useful for the world no matter if the consequences are unclear or not for three reasons.
To begin with, nobody would know whether the consequence of ongoing scientific research is good or not until it is finished. Thus, do not fund research whose consequence is unclear is highly possible to interrupt useful research. For instance, at the time of the second war, many countries tried to make nuclear weapons. But a lot of countries did not commit or just take a little money to nuclear weapon research because they were confused that if nuclear weapons could really be produced. As a result, the countries that funded the research whose consequence is unclear benefited the most in the second war. The above example illustrates that scientific research whose consequence is temporarily unclear may bring great benefits.
Moreover, scientific research is highly influenced by the technological constraints of the times which mean there would not be any outcomes if related theories are not enough. But this is not mean that the ongoing research is useless. We should keep the research going and when the related work has been done, we can get the outcomes quickly. For instance, in the field of AI (artificial intelligence), we can not make robots that are smart enough or can do some movement as quickly as human beings because the knowledge of mathematics and hardware equipment both have not met the relevant requirements. But should we shut down AI research? The answer is no. There is a lot of work we can do even if we can not get the desired result because of technological constraints. The AI example illustrates that scientific research may seem like having unclear consequences because the relevant theories or equipment are insufficient.
However, the government may think that it would be a waste of money to commit to this research whose consequences are unclear. But the long-term effects are more important than the short-term ones. And we do need to help these scientific researches which seems like have no clear outcomes in a short time.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, moreover, really, second, so, thus, for instance, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 58.6224719101 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2081.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 406.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12561576355 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87509225095 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.470443349754 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 625.5 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.0950704223 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0952380952 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 5.21951772744 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262743693152 0.243740707755 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0903040651013 0.0831039109588 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0697931895744 0.0758088955206 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182482504664 0.150359130593 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0852813062322 0.0667264976115 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.