Governments should offer college and university education free of charge to all students.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In devel

Essay topics:

Governments should offer college and university education free of charge to all students.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.

This topic raises the most vacillating issue of whether the government should provide free education at both college and university levels to all the students. Indisputably, if the government do so it increases the financial burden on it's shoulders. Neverthless, providing scholarships to the merit students has not been implemented to the fullest due to lack of funds to the government. Now if the governmant announces the free education to all the students then it only increases the burden on citizens of country in some or other form. Thus, I generally disagree with the proposal of free education to all at college and university and would argue that it should be limited to particular class of students who are merit, poor.

First of all, college and university education have become so expensive to afford. I would like to point out that many private and even public universities charge a way more than what an average student can afford. To illustrate this let us look the example of IITs in India where struggle alot to get into and even asked to pay more than 2 Lakh Rupees per annum. Many private colleges charge more than 10 Lakhs Rupees for entire four years of engineering. While there may be students who can afford such a high fee, many cannot. In this circumstance, obviously there is a need from government to such students. Consequently, it is pretty obvious that free education should be limited to students who cannot afford their education.

Furthermore, the government is struggling to provide fee reimbursement to the engineering students in India though this scheme covers only limited students, then it is dubitable how would it succed to provide free education to every student. Specifically, one of my senior from our college has got to pay last 2 years of his engineering fee to get his certificates as the government failed to pay the reimbursement in time. This clearly depicts the struggle facing by the government. Both common sense and personal experience have told us that free education to all is definitely not so helpful. Hence, all the evidences above demonstrates that free education must be limited and only then it will be effective.

Admittedly, free education to all is not good for both government and students too. This is true especially when it comes to the quality of education which gets detorriated when it is free. In addition, students put in some real efforts when they know how much does it actually costs to them. So giving it away for free may led to the lack of seriousness in the studies. However, the above argument does not constitute a sufficient support to claim that free education to all. Because of all these reasons free education to all is not credulous.

In conclusion, although the free education to all is a great idea to follow on, it is not affordable. So keeping it limited to only to a class of poor and merit students it can be implemented effectively.

Votes
Average: 5.4 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
This topic raises the most vacillating i...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 718, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...limited to particular class of students who are merit, poor. First of all, col...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lass of students who are merit, poor. First of all, college and university edu...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts who cannot afford their education. Furthermore, the government is strugglin...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 465, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to face'.
Suggestion: to face
...time. This clearly depicts the struggle facing by the government. Both common sense an...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d and only then it will be effective. Admittedly, free education to all is not...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 264, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...in some real efforts when they know how much does it actually costs to them. So givi...
^^^^
Line 9, column 485, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rt to claim that free education to all. Because of all these reasons free education to ...
^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ee education to all is not credulous. In conclusion, although the free educati...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, may, so, then, thus, while, in addition, in conclusion, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 28.0 12.9106741573 217% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2449.0 2235.4752809 110% => OK
No of words: 500.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.898 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72870804502 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87184609615 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 770.4 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2847490237 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.96 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52 5.21951772744 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204613388378 0.243740707755 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0668360695687 0.0831039109588 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054336469535 0.0758088955206 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121312099759 0.150359130593 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482724332095 0.0667264976115 72% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.