Governments should offer college and university education free of charge to all students.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Education is one of the most important aspects of life for students. Education is the differentiating factor between a poverty stricken country and a developed country. The role of government to provide university and college education is vital one. The way government chooses or frames an education policy will have a direct impact on the students and indirectly on the nation. The prompt recommends that governments ought to provide college and university education free of cost to all the students. In my opinion, I mostly agree with the recommendation due to two reasons.
To begin, education policies should be set in such a way that both - the universities as well as students be benefitted by policy. Moreover, the education policy drafted by government should provide education at low cost or free of charge. This step ensures that the people who are poor and cannot afford educating themselves can get education a good university. In addition, education increases the literacy rate of the country and thereby improving the status as a developed country. For instance, Germany provides free education to everyone. This has led Germany acquiring a very talented pool of applicants. Consequently, these students contribute to breakthrough in technology thereby putting Germany at the forefront of technology. Though, providing education at free of cost will not only hinder the profits of the universities but also will affect the ability to sustain themselves due to low cash inflow. However, the government can pay those universities to sustain themselves. This will lead to increased literacy rates and betterment of the country on a global level.
In addition, universities can take up an exam which will test the abilities of the students and the most talented student should be given a full ride scholarship. This exam will bring in competitiveness and a talented pool of applicant. Moreover, those students don't pass the cut off of this examination will be asked a pay a nominal fees to the university. For instance, in India, the Government conducts a joint entrance examination, those who pass in this examination are given a full ride scholarship. This type of exams will ensure a competitive spirit and the prestigious universities will fetch in talented students. These students may go on to contribute in groundbreaking research and further putting that specific university on the apex of academia.
In sum, the government should provide education to free of cost or at a lower tuition fees so that those who cannot afford education fees will study in the universities. Hence, an exam should be conducted to filter out the talented students and further allotment of scholarship can be done.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 380, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... students and indirectly on the nation. The prompt recommends that governments ough...
^^^
Line 3, column 87, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...such a way that both - the universities as well as students be benefitted by policy. Moreo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 306, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to educate'.
Suggestion: to educate
...e people who are poor and cannot afford educating themselves can get education a good uni...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 263, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... of applicant. Moreover, those students dont pass the cut off of this examination wi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, for instance, in addition, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.4196629213 185% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 32.0 12.9106741573 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2283.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 437.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22425629291 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08581640417 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.45766590389 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 735.3 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.8214604168 60.3974514979 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.125 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2083333333 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08333333333 5.21951772744 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191650053787 0.243740707755 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06366408645 0.0831039109588 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503868240752 0.0758088955206 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130082228847 0.150359130593 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0458739523848 0.0667264976115 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.