The flow chart illustrates the consequence of deforestation. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features.
The flow chart depicts the ramifications of clear cutting of forests or deforestation. There are four major consequences shown in the flowchart.
Due to deforestation, heavy logging equipment compresses the soil which inturns leads to hardening and baking of soil. As a result, there is a rain water runoff which in turn leads to flooding.
Second consequence of clear cutting of forest is fewer roots of plants and trees hold in the top soil thereby leading to top soil erosion. As a result, pioneer species move in and vegetation is degraded leading to less biodiversity.
Third major consequence of deforestation is increased risk of burning be it deliberate or accidental burning. Consequently, waste wood from logging is destroyed and micro-organisms feeding on the waste wood are lost. This leads to same scenario as in third paragraph, less biodiversity is seen due to degradation of vegetation and moving in of pioneer species.
Fourth consequence of deforestation is plants return less moisture to air which leads to less precipitation thereby leading to drought. This gives rise to similar scenario as seen in previous paragraph, decline in the biodiversity because of pioneer species moving in and degradation of vegetation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 146, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or consequences shown in the flowchart. Due to deforestation, heavy logging equi...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, second, so, third, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1052.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36734693878 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2356433294 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525510204082 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.513782281 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6363636364 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8181818182 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.082949142903 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0368556953624 0.103423049105 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448951892204 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0553040304404 0.15604864568 35% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488034687405 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.