The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
The line graph depicts the consumption of Fish, Lamb, Beef, and Chicken in an European country for 25 years from 1979 to 2004. Units are in grams of fish and meat consumed per week by a person.
In general, in 1979 people were inclined towards eating Lamb and beef as evidenced by graph where in a person ate 150 grams of Lamb per week and almost 225 grams of beef per week. However, people's penchant for Lamb and Beef decreased by approximately 50% and in 2004 - a person ate almost 75 grams of lamb per week and approximately 125 grams per of Beef per week. Simultaneously, the fish consumption decreased slightly from almost 60 grams per week to around 40 grams per week from 1979 to 2004 respectively.
In terms of chicken there was an exponential increase in consumption of chicken as a person in 1979 ate almost 145 grams per week whereas in 2004 a person ate almost 250 grams per week which is a 60% increase in Chicken consumption. Moreover, 1984 to 1989 the average consumption of Beef in a week was almost 240 grams per person.
In 1979, the meat which was consumed the highest was Beef and the least consumed meat was Fish. However, the meat which consumed the highest in 2004 is Chicken and the least consumed meat in 2004 was same as 1979 - Fish.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 76, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ion of Fish, Lamb, Beef, and Chicken in an European country for 25 years from 1979...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, moreover, so, whereas, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1030.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.49781659389 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51969932494 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.379912663755 0.547539520022 69% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.883080463 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.444444444 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4444444444 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183667104448 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117767703877 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0828617014365 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160540999199 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0975910607944 0.0819641961636 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.94 61.2550243902 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.12 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.67 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 76, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ion of Fish, Lamb, Beef, and Chicken in an European country for 25 years from 1979...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, moreover, so, whereas, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1030.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.49781659389 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51969932494 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.379912663755 0.547539520022 69% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.883080463 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.444444444 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4444444444 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183667104448 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117767703877 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0828617014365 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160540999199 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0975910607944 0.0819641961636 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.94 61.2550243902 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.12 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.67 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.