A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
National Curriculum is critical factor in deciding the development of the nation and its progress economically. The prompt recommends that nations require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. In my opinion, I strongly disagree with this suggestion that there should be a predefined curricula for pre-college studies for three reasons.
To begin, the students who are interested in many fields of study should have the availability of the courses of their interest before entering college. Thus, to choose ones profession after college is dependent on the sole availability of the courses that interest them. If a nation is imposing a predefined national curriculum for studies before college, it would impede the development of the students who want to study the subjects they link. For instance, a student is interested in lingual studies but due to the prefixed national curriculum, the subject of his interest is not available in the curriculum. Consequently, he will show apathy towards the subject present in the curriculum leading to poor grades and not studying what he would have liked to in the first place. The above example show the importance of flexible curriculum in before entering the college.
In addition, if we impose a flexible curriculum, the benefits will be huge because the students will be studying their field of interest and would excel in those subjects. Consequently, leading to increased literacy rate in the country and further development of the country. For example, National Education Policy (NEP) of India have imposed a 5+3+3+4 scheme in order to bring out the talent the students studying in India. The main highlights of the scheme are "flexibility to choose subjects across all streams", ''Board exams to only check the core competencies of the students", "Multilingual approach and preference for local language". The scheme add in a new way to study and is far better than traditional 10+2 scheme where in the national curriculum was fixed.
Therefore, a nation's curriculum should not be bounded by a rigid national curriculum. It have should have the flexibility that would cater to the interests of the students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 170, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...efore entering college. Thus, to choose ones profession after college is dependent o...
^^^^
Line 5, column 680, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a new way" with adverb for "new"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...or local language'. The scheme add in a new way to study and is far better than traditi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 14, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
... curriculum was fixed. Therefore, a nations curriculum should not be bounded by a r...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 90, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
...nded by a rigid national curriculum. It have should have the flexibility that would ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in addition, in my opinion, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1881.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 354.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31355932203 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11022593687 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497175141243 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 595.8 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4354199134 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.5625 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 5.21951772744 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.480297374325 0.243740707755 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170973329696 0.0831039109588 206% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.177397359198 0.0758088955206 234% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.330498716433 0.150359130593 220% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.168871681893 0.0667264976115 253% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.