International tourism has brought enormous benefits to many places. At the same time, there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment.
Do the disadvantages of international tourism outweigh the advantages?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Some people believe that International Tourism has been beneficial to many places. Simultaneously, some people are concerned about tourists impact on the environment and local people living in these places. In my opinion, the advantages of international tourism outweigh the disadvantages due to two reasons.
Firstly, international tourism is vital to local economic growth. tourists visit these touristy places and therefore contribute to sales of goods, leading to an increase in gross domestic product per capita. International tourism is an income source for local inhabitants and a way for them to have a sustainable lifestyle. For instance, France is 90 percent dependent on tourism sector where major attraction being Eiffel tower. The local inhabitants benefit from tourists as their restaurants and shops thrive and they earn a good amount of profit. Therefore, their is minimal impact on local inhabitants.
Secondly, impact on environment is low than expected. Countries which attract large number of tourists each year have very strict rules and regulations in regards to hampering of environment. Most of the rules are for littering in national parks, forests and in public places. If these rules are not followedby tourists, then countries impose large amount of fines to these tourists or sometimes the tourists are imprisoned. Due to such rules, tourists are scared to hamper the environment and their surroundings. Therefore, the impact on environment is minimal.
In conclusion, I believe that international tourists are beneficial to many places. In fact, international tourists boost the sales of goods, leading to economic growth of the area. As a result, local inhabitants are profitable due to international tourism. In addition, the impact on environment is minimal due to strict rules been imposed by the countries to counter hampering of the environment and surroundings.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 67, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Tourists
...rism is vital to local economic growth. tourists visit these touristy places and therefo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 563, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...arn a good amount of profit. Therefore, their is minimal impact on local inhabitants....
^^^^^
Line 5, column 153, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
... have very strict rules and regulations in regards to hampering of environment. Most of the r...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 564, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., the impact on environment is minimal. In conclusion, I believe that internatio...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1617.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55670103093 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13536550995 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498281786942 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.9383929124 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.1052631579 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3157894737 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42105263158 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302952513131 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105497822645 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799426061881 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202395356539 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0864082524624 0.056905535591 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.