Governments should offer college and university education free of charge to all students.
Government should offer college and university education free of charge to unprivileged students of the country. However, it is not pragmatic to allow free college and university education to all the students of the country because college and university education is very costly. Hence, I diasgree with the statement for the following reasons.
First of all, it is acceptable to allow diligent and unpriviliged students a free university and college education or to provide them a scholarship to ease their financial difficulties. But, it is not a practicle approach to allow all the students a free college education. If a student come from an affluent family, their parents can afford college and university education. Why should the goverment bear the cost of the education of financially capable students? The government can use such money for development of the country.
Secondly, college and university education is very costly. The lab equipments used in engineering and sciences are costly. To build a lab facility in colleges around the country demands millions of dollars and to build college and university campus is also very costly. Now, if a government of a country spends all those dollars to bulid colleges and university, there are other expenses too to provide education such as maintanance and salaries of staff members. Above that if government of one country makes college and university education free, there might be chances that the government may not left with the money to make other necessary developments in the country. Therefore, the statement is not pragmatic.
Thirdly, if a country is a developing country then it becomes more unpracticle to provide the free college and university education to all the students. Because such cpuntries not even have enough money to provide basic needs such as clean water, roof and food. So, it is not possible for such countries to provide free college and university education to all the students.
In conclusion, the statement fails to account many secanarios and is fundamentally wrong. I agree with the idea that the government of a coutry should provide free college and university educaion to unpriviliged students. But it is not pragmatic approach to provide free college and university education to all the student of the country especially to those who can affoard it easily.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 523, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uch money for development of the country Secondly college and university educatio...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 381, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ially to those who can affoard it easily
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, third, thirdly, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 12.9106741573 194% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1958.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 379.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16622691293 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88208064502 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 215.323595506 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.385224274406 0.4932671777 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 649.8 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 20.2370786517 5% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 379.0 23.0359550562 1645% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 60.3974514979 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1958.0 118.986275619 1646% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 379.0 23.4991977007 1613% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 134.0 5.21951772744 2567% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 10.2758426966 10% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.598709354763 0.243740707755 246% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.598709354763 0.0831039109588 720% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0758088955206 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.42274503312 0.150359130593 281% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131702159054 0.0667264976115 197% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 192.4 14.1392134831 1361% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -321.67 48.8420337079 -659% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.92365168539 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 152.3 12.1743820225 1251% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.19 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 25.1 8.38706741573 299% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 64.0 100.480337079 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 64.0 11.8971910112 538% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 153.6 11.2143820225 1370% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 154.0 11.7820224719 1307% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 523, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uch money for development of the country Secondly college and university educatio...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 381, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ially to those who can affoard it easily
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, third, thirdly, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 12.9106741573 194% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1958.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 379.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16622691293 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88208064502 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 215.323595506 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.385224274406 0.4932671777 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 649.8 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 20.2370786517 5% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 379.0 23.0359550562 1645% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 60.3974514979 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1958.0 118.986275619 1646% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 379.0 23.4991977007 1613% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 134.0 5.21951772744 2567% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 10.2758426966 10% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.598709354763 0.243740707755 246% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.598709354763 0.0831039109588 720% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0758088955206 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.42274503312 0.150359130593 281% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131702159054 0.0667264976115 197% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 192.4 14.1392134831 1361% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -321.67 48.8420337079 -659% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.92365168539 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 152.3 12.1743820225 1251% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.19 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 25.1 8.38706741573 299% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 64.0 100.480337079 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 64.0 11.8971910112 538% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 153.6 11.2143820225 1370% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 154.0 11.7820224719 1307% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.