Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
All eligible students having ability to learn should be provided with free university education. Education is a crucial element in building an individual’s future. Education helps not only in academic development of a person, but also in overall development. Universities help students to become successful professionals by giving the foundation of higher education which is requisite to get jobs. So, the author’s statement can be agreed completely.
Not all students come from same economic background. Some students will be good academically but they will not be able to afford university education because of destitution and increased cost of education, and they end up taking drudging jobs. If such students are not able to study further their sheer talent is wasted in doing some menial work. If such students are provided with financial help, they prove to be assets to society and they emerge as doctors, engineers, lawyers, artists etc, who contribute to the development of society. Also, if eligible students are given free education, they will definitely make their contributions back to the society by doing some good work. It help in socio-economic development of the country as well.
Moreover, giving free education to students coming from poverty helps them to become independent and helps them to become financially secure, there by reducing the unemployment problem of the country. Also, the help which the students have taken may inspire them to help more such students once they become capable of earning money and there by helping more people to get educated. Moreover, instead of spending money on petty things or various allowances of politicians, government can spend that part of money on students’ free education.
In contrast, if stringent rules are not in place for scrutinizing the students willing to take up free education, the facility can be exploited. Moreover, universities need money to continue functioning. Lot of expenses occur to maintain state of art educational facilities like well qualified faculties, high tech labs, library, classrooms etc. If many of the students are taking free education, the quality of education may deteriorate because of lack of money to run the university. Government should make strict laws pertaining to providing free education so that only eligible and deserving students get free education.
In conclusion, free university education should be given to all meritorious students coming from poor economical background. It helps the student, his family and the society. It leads to a well educated smart society. However, there should be stringent laws for scrutiny of students claiming to be poor and willing to take help from government, otherwise, the government funds will be misused for a great extent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 245, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
..., and they end up taking drudging jobs. If such students are not able to study fur...
^^
Line 3, column 688, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'helps'?
Suggestion: helps
...the society by doing some good work. It help in socio-economic development of the co...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, in conclusion, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 28.0 12.9106741573 217% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2363.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 437.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40732265446 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97103436992 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489702517162 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 742.5 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.6850649195 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.739130435 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.26086956522 5.21951772744 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184889058357 0.243740707755 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617881858074 0.0831039109588 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415228623509 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121867390358 0.150359130593 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336091745968 0.0667264976115 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.