Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.
Education plays important role in people's life. Prompt claims that government should fund students who admitted to a university but do not have enough resources for education. I mostly disagree with this statement for two reasons, which I will explain below.
To begin with, high education fees lead to inequality between students from rich families and those who have low income. The money of the family does not represent ability of the student to absorb useful information from an educational institute. To clarify, however, one of the most expensive university ADA in Azerbaijan has great educational system, students do not use it in a proper way, as a result, efficiency diminishes. In addition, in accordance to local statistics, people with lack of funds, which get their education in not expensive universities, will have above-average salaries in the future. Therefore, education in universities like ADA should be free for everyone who has been admitted in order to improve efficiency of education.
Secondly, government investments in education of citizens will lead to high skilled labor force in future. For example, Government Funded scholarship program in most countries has a goal to educate their citizens abroad in order to have employee with great knowledge and experience after 4 years of the education. In addition, one student funded by government gave more profit than expenses of the education, because employee with deep insights about his/her proficiency will improve economic conditions of the country.
In conclusion, however, some may argue that education cannot be free for everyone, I strongly believe that in today’s world education institutes should not separate students in accordance to their financial position. Government should help to get knowledge for people from poor family and government prosperity would increase via this educated students.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 378, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proper way" with adverb for "proper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...cational system, students do not use it in a proper way, as a result, efficiency diminishes. In...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 98, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...s will lead to high skilled labor force in future. For example, Government Funded schola...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 356, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ld increase via this educated students.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 19.5258426966 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 12.9106741573 194% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1604.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 291.0 442.535393258 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51202749141 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93492116369 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 215.323595506 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567010309278 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 704.065955056 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3324670749 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.384615385 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3846153846 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46153846154 5.21951772744 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301453067715 0.243740707755 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112766937625 0.0831039109588 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0990742092414 0.0758088955206 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188761473847 0.150359130593 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0680318143925 0.0667264976115 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 48.8420337079 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.1639044944 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 378, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proper way" with adverb for "proper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...cational system, students do not use it in a proper way, as a result, efficiency diminishes. In...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 98, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...s will lead to high skilled labor force in future. For example, Government Funded schola...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 356, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ld increase via this educated students.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 19.5258426966 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 12.9106741573 194% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1604.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 291.0 442.535393258 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51202749141 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93492116369 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 215.323595506 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567010309278 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 704.065955056 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3324670749 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.384615385 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3846153846 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46153846154 5.21951772744 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301453067715 0.243740707755 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112766937625 0.0831039109588 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0990742092414 0.0758088955206 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188761473847 0.150359130593 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0680318143925 0.0667264976115 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 48.8420337079 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.1639044944 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.